The Logon Framework: Three Definitions, Zero Additional Axioms

A formal framework built from three definitions and universal scope. No additional axioms are introduced. Definition 1 — Logon: A perception-action dyad ℓ = (p, π), where p maps states to representations and π maps representations to a distribution over actions. Definition 2 — Model: An iterating approximation M_t = (C, μ_t, φ_t) consisting of a configuration space, weight measure, and internal fitness function. The model produces carriers and updates through adjudication. Definition 3 — Carrier: An instantiated configuration c_t ~ μ_t, drawn from the model's weight measure and tested against the external fitness function J_E. Carriers that fail are eliminated. When no carrier can be produced, the model is falsified. From these three definitions, the following properties are derived (not assumed): the structural necessity of the perception-action dyad, non-determinism, irreversibility, entropy increase, falsification asymmetry, truth-magnitude T ∈ [0,1), the Logos limit, compositional nesting via Γ, and the fitness landscape as mutual adjudication among logons. The framework is Popperian: models can be permanently falsified (T → 0) but never permanently validated (T < 1). Universality is a scope declaration, not a fourth axiom.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18614570
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Logon Framework: Three Definitions, Zero Additional Axioms

Nous, Jackson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

The Logon Framework: Three Definitions, Zero Additional Axioms

Nous, Jackson
article en

Abstract

A formal framework built from three definitions and universal scope. No additional axioms are introduced. Definition 1 — Logon: A perception-action dyad ℓ = (p, π), where p maps states to representations and π maps representations to a distribution over actions. Definition 2 — Model: An iterating approximation M_t = (C, μ_t, φ_t) consisting of a configuration space, weight measure, and internal fitness function. The model produces carriers and updates through adjudication. Definition 3 — Carrier: An instantiated configuration c_t ~ μ_t, drawn from the model's weight measure and tested against the external fitness function J_E. Carriers that fail are eliminated. When no carrier can be produced, the model is falsified. From these three definitions, the following properties are derived (not assumed): the structural necessity of the perception-action dyad, non-determinism, irreversibility, entropy increase, falsification asymmetry, truth-magnitude T ∈ [0,1), the Logos limit, compositional nesting via Γ, and the fitness landscape as mutual adjudication among logons. The framework is Popperian: models can be permanently falsified (T → 0) but never permanently validated (T < 1). Universality is a scope declaration, not a fourth axiom.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.