Archetypes of the Technology S-Curve

The S-curve model is widely used to describe the typical trajectory of technological performance over time, characterized by slow initial progress, a phase of rapid improvement, and eventual stagnation. However, empirical studies indicate that many development trajectories deviate from this pattern. This paper proposes a typology of six ideal-type S-curve archetypes that reflect the variety of observed development paths: the classic S-curve, early breakthrough, delayed breakthrough, steady mover, rejuvenated plateau, and non-starter. The typology is developed using a theory-building approach based on conceptual reasoning and grounded in existing literature. It provides a structured framework for analyzing technological development in contexts where quantitative data are limited or fragmented. The archetypes are intended to support early-stage technology assessment and strategic decision-making by offering a common basis for comparison across cases. Rather than predicting specific outcomes, the framework enables a systematic interpretation of development patterns and helps to identify recurring dynamics in technology evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictmod66732.2025.11371791
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Archetypes of the Technology S-Curve

Florian Degen, Miha Podbreznik
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
article

Archetypes of the Technology S-Curve

Florian Degen, Miha Podbreznik
article en

Abstract

The S-curve model is widely used to describe the typical trajectory of technological performance over time, characterized by slow initial progress, a phase of rapid improvement, and eventual stagnation. However, empirical studies indicate that many development trajectories deviate from this pattern. This paper proposes a typology of six ideal-type S-curve archetypes that reflect the variety of observed development paths: the classic S-curve, early breakthrough, delayed breakthrough, steady mover, rejuvenated plateau, and non-starter. The typology is developed using a theory-building approach based on conceptual reasoning and grounded in existing literature. It provides a structured framework for analyzing technological development in contexts where quantitative data are limited or fragmented. The archetypes are intended to support early-stage technology assessment and strategic decision-making by offering a common basis for comparison across cases. Rather than predicting specific outcomes, the framework enables a systematic interpretation of development patterns and helps to identify recurring dynamics in technology evolution.

Fraunhofer Research Institution for Battery Cell Production (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.