Immunohistochemistry New Instrument Validations: Why Your Validation Plan Matters

Validation in immunohistochemistry is a well-established and regulated process when it pertains to assays. However, little guidance currently exists on how to best validate automated instrumentation, including validation of a completely new platform or validation of a new instrument of the same make and model. Here, we share insights gained from our laboratory's recent instrument validations, identifying key challenges such as variability in stain intensity related to tissue location on slides and the prevalence of "cold zones" affecting stain interpretation. Through these scenarios, we emphasize the importance of a robust validation plan that incorporates diverse assay-tissue combinations, strategic tissue placement, and the evaluation of larger tissue sections. In addition, we advocate for vendors to enhance their instrument testing protocols to proactively identify subtle performance issues. We propose a framework for more effective validation strategies, including emerging quantitative technologies in this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000001306
Primary Topic
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunohistochemistry New Instrument Validations: Why Your Validation Plan Matters

Yasodha Natkunam, Ellen Gomulia, Sebastian Fernandez-Pol, Kelly Young et al.
Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
article

Immunohistochemistry New Instrument Validations: Why Your Validation Plan Matters

Yasodha Natkunam, Ellen Gomulia, Sebastian Fernandez-Pol, Kelly Young, Ivy Mangonon
article en

Abstract

Validation in immunohistochemistry is a well-established and regulated process when it pertains to assays. However, little guidance currently exists on how to best validate automated instrumentation, including validation of a completely new platform or validation of a new instrument of the same make and model. Here, we share insights gained from our laboratory's recent instrument validations, identifying key challenges such as variability in stain intensity related to tissue location on slides and the prevalence of "cold zones" affecting stain interpretation. Through these scenarios, we emphasize the importance of a robust validation plan that incorporates diverse assay-tissue combinations, strategic tissue placement, and the evaluation of larger tissue sections. In addition, we advocate for vendors to enhance their instrument testing protocols to proactively identify subtle performance issues. We propose a framework for more effective validation strategies, including emerging quantitative technologies in this field.

Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphologyVol. 34(2)
Stanford Medicine (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Immunohistochemistry New Instrument Validations: Why Your Validation Plan Matters — Yasodha Natkunam, Ellen Gomulia, et al. · Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS