The Handover Protocol: Formalizing Necessary Regime Thinning Under Automation

This paper formally characterizes necessary regime thinning and distinguishes it from degenerative regime collapse in contexts where witnessed regimes encounter tempo and load conditions incompatible with real-time human discretion. The paper introduces the Handover Protocol as a descriptive framework for identifying when and how a regime may legitimately transition to automation without dissolving attribution, accountability, or intelligibility. Handover is structurally present when four conditions co-occur: (1) witness incompatibility due to latency constraints, (2) execution delegation to automated systems, (3) attributional termination relocation to non-real-time loci with constraint authority, and (4) non-displaceable consequence exposure. The framework distinguishes necessary thinning (automation as required transition) from degenerative thinning (regime dissolution through informal offloading). Case analyses of medical triage and military air defense demonstrate application of the diagnostic framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18615342
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Handover Protocol: Formalizing Necessary Regime Thinning Under Automation

Michael Semprevivo
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The Handover Protocol: Formalizing Necessary Regime Thinning Under Automation

Michael Semprevivo
article en

Abstract

This paper formally characterizes necessary regime thinning and distinguishes it from degenerative regime collapse in contexts where witnessed regimes encounter tempo and load conditions incompatible with real-time human discretion. The paper introduces the Handover Protocol as a descriptive framework for identifying when and how a regime may legitimately transition to automation without dissolving attribution, accountability, or intelligibility. Handover is structurally present when four conditions co-occur: (1) witness incompatibility due to latency constraints, (2) execution delegation to automated systems, (3) attributional termination relocation to non-real-time loci with constraint authority, and (4) non-displaceable consequence exposure. The framework distinguishes necessary thinning (automation as required transition) from degenerative thinning (regime dissolution through informal offloading). Case analyses of medical triage and military air defense demonstrate application of the diagnostic framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.