Navigating digital colonialism: Sovereignty models and development paths in the Global South

This study examines how Global South countries confront the pressures of digital colonialism while seeking digital sovereignty and sustainable development. Digital colonialism is understood as an external force that limits national autonomy through technological dependence, regulatory dominance, and data extraction. Against this backdrop, the paper develops a framework of four sovereignty models—Independent, Cooperative, Dependent, and Custodial—based on comparative case studies of South Africa, Thailand, Nigeria, and Laos. These models are applied through a cross-regional comparative analysis to clarify how sovereignty configurations differ across countries. The analysis shows that sovereignty is not a binary condition but a spectrum shaped by both external constraints and internal strategies, which in turn determine whether digital industries generate endogenous growth or remain tied to colonial dependencies. By linking African and Asian experiences, the paper offers a comparative perspective on how different trajectories of digital industrialization emerge in the Global South and highlights pathways such as regional collaboration and domestic innovation for resisting digital colonialism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102546
Primary Topic
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating digital colonialism: Sovereignty models and development paths in the Global South

WenLong Song, Yang P. Liu
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
article

Navigating digital colonialism: Sovereignty models and development paths in the Global South

WenLong Song, Yang P. Liu
article en

Abstract

This study examines how Global South countries confront the pressures of digital colonialism while seeking digital sovereignty and sustainable development. Digital colonialism is understood as an external force that limits national autonomy through technological dependence, regulatory dominance, and data extraction. Against this backdrop, the paper develops a framework of four sovereignty models—Independent, Cooperative, Dependent, and Custodial—based on comparative case studies of South Africa, Thailand, Nigeria, and Laos. These models are applied through a cross-regional comparative analysis to clarify how sovereignty configurations differ across countries. The analysis shows that sovereignty is not a binary condition but a spectrum shaped by both external constraints and internal strategies, which in turn determine whether digital industries generate endogenous growth or remain tied to colonial dependencies. By linking African and Asian experiences, the paper offers a comparative perspective on how different trajectories of digital industrialization emerge in the Global South and highlights pathways such as regional collaboration and domestic innovation for resisting digital colonialism.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating digital colonialism: Sovereignty models and development paths in the Global South — WenLong Song, Yang P. Liu · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS