Canadian Society Breast Imaging Position Statement on Mammographic Breast Density and Supplemental Screening

Screening aims to detect breast cancer before it becomes clinically apparent, enabling identification of tumors when they are smaller and have not yet spread and when treatment options are more effective, less invasive, and more affordable. However, screening mammography has known limitations, with breast density being a primary challenge. Denser breast tissue not only increases the likelihood of cancer but also makes tumors harder to detect due to overlapping tissue. Strong evidence now exists to support updating our previous guidelines to recommend supplemental screening beyond mammography for individuals with American College of Radiology category c or d breast density. Supplemental screening methods, such as MRI, contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), or US (in that order of preference) can significantly improve cancer detection rates. We recognize that implementing these recommendations across Canada will present challenges. Nevertheless, a collaborative effort among radiologists, health care stakeholders, and policymakers is essential to drive gradual, meaningful improvements in breast cancer detection and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breast Imaging
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf064
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canadian Society Breast Imaging Position Statement on Mammographic Breast Density and Supplemental Screening

Jean M. Seely, Zina Kellow, Paula B. Gordon, Supriya Kulkarni
1 citations
Journal of Breast Imaging
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
1.52
article

Canadian Society Breast Imaging Position Statement on Mammographic Breast Density and Supplemental Screening

Jean M. Seely, Zina Kellow, Paula B. Gordon, Supriya Kulkarni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Screening aims to detect breast cancer before it becomes clinically apparent, enabling identification of tumors when they are smaller and have not yet spread and when treatment options are more effective, less invasive, and more affordable. However, screening mammography has known limitations, with breast density being a primary challenge. Denser breast tissue not only increases the likelihood of cancer but also makes tumors harder to detect due to overlapping tissue. Strong evidence now exists to support updating our previous guidelines to recommend supplemental screening beyond mammography for individuals with American College of Radiology category c or d breast density. Supplemental screening methods, such as MRI, contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), or US (in that order of preference) can significantly improve cancer detection rates. We recognize that implementing these recommendations across Canada will present challenges. Nevertheless, a collaborative effort among radiologists, health care stakeholders, and policymakers is essential to drive gradual, meaningful improvements in breast cancer detection and outcomes.

Journal of Breast ImagingVol. 8(1)
Dalhousie University (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.