PASSING OFF: A CONCEPT OF UNFAIR COMPETITION THAT MAY NOT BE IMPLEMENTABLE IN INDONESIA

Unfair competition in business has long been debated in Indonesia among both businessmen and academics. Although the country possesses several laws addressing unfair competition, their enforcement remains ineffective, particularly in the area of intellectual property rights (IPR), with trademarks being the most affected. Such practices not only undermine the financial capacity of companies but also disrupt the national economy, reduce workers’ welfare, and hinder broader development. Addressing unfair competition must therefore begin at the level of IPR policy-making and be further reinforced through concrete technical regulations. Since the enactment of various trademark laws, numerous infringers have been punished in accordance with the level of their offenses. However, these legal outcomes have not significantly deterred perpetrators, especially those engaged in cross-docking. This is because Indonesian trademark law is primarily designed to protect registered trademark owners rather than to directly combat unfair competition. Consequently, a more concrete approach is required, either by extending the scope of trademark law to tackle such practices or by formulating new legal strategies. One possible avenue is to establish a separate legal regime specifically aimed at abolishing attachment claims linked to unfair competition. Yet this option is time-consuming, requiring extensive discussion, socialization, and agreement on mechanisms for proving actual damages in court. Moreover, if stronger measures are to be enacted through new legislation, the drafting and approval process will inevitably be lengthy, given that legislation is a political product requiring consensus from the House of Representatives. Thus, while Indonesia has laid a legal foundation for protecting trademarks, eliminating unfair competition demands both policy innovation and stronger enforcement to safeguard businesses and promote sustainable economic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18609584
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PASSING OFF: A CONCEPT OF UNFAIR COMPETITION THAT MAY NOT BE IMPLEMENTABLE IN INDONESIA

Donny Alamsyah Sheyoputra*, Idris, Eddy Damian
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

PASSING OFF: A CONCEPT OF UNFAIR COMPETITION THAT MAY NOT BE IMPLEMENTABLE IN INDONESIA

Donny Alamsyah Sheyoputra*, Idris, Eddy Damian
article en

Abstract

Unfair competition in business has long been debated in Indonesia among both businessmen and academics. Although the country possesses several laws addressing unfair competition, their enforcement remains ineffective, particularly in the area of intellectual property rights (IPR), with trademarks being the most affected. Such practices not only undermine the financial capacity of companies but also disrupt the national economy, reduce workers’ welfare, and hinder broader development. Addressing unfair competition must therefore begin at the level of IPR policy-making and be further reinforced through concrete technical regulations. Since the enactment of various trademark laws, numerous infringers have been punished in accordance with the level of their offenses. However, these legal outcomes have not significantly deterred perpetrators, especially those engaged in cross-docking. This is because Indonesian trademark law is primarily designed to protect registered trademark owners rather than to directly combat unfair competition. Consequently, a more concrete approach is required, either by extending the scope of trademark law to tackle such practices or by formulating new legal strategies. One possible avenue is to establish a separate legal regime specifically aimed at abolishing attachment claims linked to unfair competition. Yet this option is time-consuming, requiring extensive discussion, socialization, and agreement on mechanisms for proving actual damages in court. Moreover, if stronger measures are to be enacted through new legislation, the drafting and approval process will inevitably be lengthy, given that legislation is a political product requiring consensus from the House of Representatives. Thus, while Indonesia has laid a legal foundation for protecting trademarks, eliminating unfair competition demands both policy innovation and stronger enforcement to safeguard businesses and promote sustainable economic development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Padjadjaran University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.