Functional cognitive screening instruments and their clinical utility with older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review

Cognitive screening is a vital part of geriatric emergency department (ED) care. Performance-based functional cognitive measures may better identify impairments and predict post-discharge outcomes in daily activities. Currently, there is no evidence base informing the selection of suitable functional cognition instruments for emergency care. We conducted a systematic review to find psychometrically sound clinically useful instruments for assessing functional cognition in older adults in the ED. Six databases were searched to identify performance-based instruments measuring functional cognition and related psychometric studies, using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Studies with a mean age under 65 were excluded. Clinical utility in the ED was evaluated using a newly updated, author-designed, criterion-based consensus matrix. Results were synthesised into a best-evidence summary. We identified 28 instruments and 44 adaptations across 138 studies assessing eight of the nine measurement properties. Construct validity (discriminative and convergent) was most frequently evaluated (87%). Three instruments met all eight clinical utility criteria; however, none have been tested in ED: the Texas Functional Living Scale (moderate-high sufficient construct validity); the Menu Task (moderate-high sufficient construct validity, low-very low sufficient internal consistency and reliability), and the Pillbox Test (moderate sufficient predictive, high sufficient discriminative, moderate inconsistent convergent validity). Overall, 61% of psychometric studies were rated as very good methodological quality. Our study is the first to identify existing instruments with established psychometric evidence that also meet clinical utility criteria for use with older adults in the ED. Robust studies are urgently needed to evaluate predictive validity for post-discharge outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ageing Research Reviews
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2026.103061
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional cognitive screening instruments and their clinical utility with older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review

Justin Newton Scanlan, Anne Cusick, Jacqueline Wesson, Francis S. Gomes
Ageing Research Reviews
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Functional cognitive screening instruments and their clinical utility with older adults in the emergency department: A systematic review

Justin Newton Scanlan, Anne Cusick, Jacqueline Wesson, Francis S. Gomes
article en

Abstract

Cognitive screening is a vital part of geriatric emergency department (ED) care. Performance-based functional cognitive measures may better identify impairments and predict post-discharge outcomes in daily activities. Currently, there is no evidence base informing the selection of suitable functional cognition instruments for emergency care. We conducted a systematic review to find psychometrically sound clinically useful instruments for assessing functional cognition in older adults in the ED. Six databases were searched to identify performance-based instruments measuring functional cognition and related psychometric studies, using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Studies with a mean age under 65 were excluded. Clinical utility in the ED was evaluated using a newly updated, author-designed, criterion-based consensus matrix. Results were synthesised into a best-evidence summary. We identified 28 instruments and 44 adaptations across 138 studies assessing eight of the nine measurement properties. Construct validity (discriminative and convergent) was most frequently evaluated (87%). Three instruments met all eight clinical utility criteria; however, none have been tested in ED: the Texas Functional Living Scale (moderate-high sufficient construct validity); the Menu Task (moderate-high sufficient construct validity, low-very low sufficient internal consistency and reliability), and the Pillbox Test (moderate sufficient predictive, high sufficient discriminative, moderate inconsistent convergent validity). Overall, 61% of psychometric studies were rated as very good methodological quality. Our study is the first to identify existing instruments with established psychometric evidence that also meet clinical utility criteria for use with older adults in the ED. Robust studies are urgently needed to evaluate predictive validity for post-discharge outcomes.

Ageing Research Reviews
The University of Sydney (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.