When Faith Aligns with Power: Kierkegaard and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd on Religion’s Association with the State

In the literature on Kierkegaard’s relation to Islam, the focus has exclusively been on the existentialist aspects, with the political dimension given little or no attention. This article shows how Kierkegaard and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, an Egyptian Muslim thinker, converge in their critiques of religion’s (Christianity and Islam) association with the state through their problematization of the state religion’s tendency to deny diversity of religious interpretations. Going beyond the analyses of both thinkers, it further argues that this tendency of state religion to deny interpretive diversity stems from its absorption of characteristics of the state, which, as a sovereign power within its territory, does not permit the coexistence of any equally powerful entity. In conclusion, the article briefly considers the possibility of building an ideal of the non-authoritarian relationship between religion and state by combining both thinkers’ critiques of the state religion.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy East and West
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2026.a983562
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Faith Aligns with Power: Kierkegaard and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd on Religion’s Association with the State

Kidhar PT
Philosophy East and West
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

When Faith Aligns with Power: Kierkegaard and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd on Religion’s Association with the State

Kidhar PT
article en

Abstract

In the literature on Kierkegaard’s relation to Islam, the focus has exclusively been on the existentialist aspects, with the political dimension given little or no attention. This article shows how Kierkegaard and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, an Egyptian Muslim thinker, converge in their critiques of religion’s (Christianity and Islam) association with the state through their problematization of the state religion’s tendency to deny diversity of religious interpretations. Going beyond the analyses of both thinkers, it further argues that this tendency of state religion to deny interpretive diversity stems from its absorption of characteristics of the state, which, as a sovereign power within its territory, does not permit the coexistence of any equally powerful entity. In conclusion, the article briefly considers the possibility of building an ideal of the non-authoritarian relationship between religion and state by combining both thinkers’ critiques of the state religion.

Philosophy East and West
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.