Impact of Syndrome Differentiation on Treatment Effects and side Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

ObjectiveIn Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), syndrome differentiation is considered to be an essential diagnostic process for tailoring Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatments to individual patients. We conducted a meta-epidemiological study to evaluate the potential impact of syndrome differentiation on improving effect estimates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Study Design and SettingSeven databases were searched to identify systematic reviews (SRs) published between 2021 and 2022 that pooled RCTs evaluating CHM treatment effects or side effects. Meta-epidemiological analyses were conducted using a two-step approach. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the disease category, outcome nature, and funding.ResultsWe included 137 SRs comprising 2,064 RCTs. The results demonstrated small and statistically nonsignificant differences in both treatment effects (ROR: 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86 to 1.00, <i>P</i> = .04 for binary outcomes; dSMD: -1.44, 95% CI: -3.95 to 1.08, <i>P</i> = .26 for continuous outcomes) and side effects (ROR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.92, <i>P</i> = .66) between RCTs that incorporated syndrome differentiation and those did not. Subgroup analysis showed RCTs of gastrointestinal disease that incorporated syndrome differentiation exhibited a larger magnitude of side effects than that did not. For binary outcomes, subgroup analyses of RCTs of circulatory diseases or those reporting subjective outcomes showed that syndrome differentiation led to a statistically significantly smaller treatment effect.ConclusionIndividualizing CHM treatments through syndrome differentiation provide no significant evidence of improvement in TCM practice outcomes in RCTs. Furthermore, subgroup analyses suggest that syndrome differentiation may be associated with a smaller treatment effect among RCTs of CHM for circulatory diseases and a possible trend toward increased side effects in patients with gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515690x261422020
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Syndrome Differentiation on Treatment Effects and side Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Irene XY Wu, Fai Fai Ho, Leonard Ho, Ming Hong Kwong et al.
Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

Impact of Syndrome Differentiation on Treatment Effects and side Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Irene XY Wu, Fai Fai Ho, Leonard Ho, Ming Hong Kwong, Betty Huan Wang, Mary Yue Jiang, Joson H.S. Zhou, Jason K.C. Lam, Claire C.W. Zhong, Shan Shan Xu, Vincent C.H. Chung
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveIn Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), syndrome differentiation is considered to be an essential diagnostic process for tailoring Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatments to individual patients. We conducted a meta-epidemiological study to evaluate the potential impact of syndrome differentiation on improving effect estimates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Study Design and SettingSeven databases were searched to identify systematic reviews (SRs) published between 2021 and 2022 that pooled RCTs evaluating CHM treatment effects or side effects. Meta-epidemiological analyses were conducted using a two-step approach. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the disease category, outcome nature, and funding.ResultsWe included 137 SRs comprising 2,064 RCTs. The results demonstrated small and statistically nonsignificant differences in both treatment effects (ROR: 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86 to 1.00, <i>P</i> = .04 for binary outcomes; dSMD: -1.44, 95% CI: -3.95 to 1.08, <i>P</i> = .26 for continuous outcomes) and side effects (ROR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.92, <i>P</i> = .66) between RCTs that incorporated syndrome differentiation and those did not. Subgroup analysis showed RCTs of gastrointestinal disease that incorporated syndrome differentiation exhibited a larger magnitude of side effects than that did not. For binary outcomes, subgroup analyses of RCTs of circulatory diseases or those reporting subjective outcomes showed that syndrome differentiation led to a statistically significantly smaller treatment effect.ConclusionIndividualizing CHM treatments through syndrome differentiation provide no significant evidence of improvement in TCM practice outcomes in RCTs. Furthermore, subgroup analyses suggest that syndrome differentiation may be associated with a smaller treatment effect among RCTs of CHM for circulatory diseases and a possible trend toward increased side effects in patients with gastrointestinal diseases.

Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative MedicineVol. 31
Central South University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.