Toward Systematic Modeling of Volcano Deformation Sources Using Automatically‐Generated InSAR Products

Abstract Volcano deformation measured through Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is ideal for volcano monitoring in many regions due to its global coverage, characteristic spatio‐temporal patterns, and modeling insights. Routinely acquired and processed Sentinel‐1 InSAR datacubes provide the first opportunity to systematically catalog, model and compare volcano deformation globally. Here, we present a framework (GBIS‐BULK) to systematically pre‐process and model volcano deformation signals, designed to be applied to routinely processed InSAR data sets. This requires a robust (semi‐) automated approach to estimate signal locations and footprints for effective pre‐processing and modeling. Our approach combines (a) filtering and clustering to locate the signal center; (b) noise reduction using Independent Component Analysis (ICA); and (c) image classification using Otsu thresholding to delimit the signal footprint. We invert for the best‐fit point source model using constraints from existing global volcano deformation catalogs. First, we examine the influence of downsampling schemes, image noise and coherence using synthetic interferograms, showing nested‐uniform downsampling is more suited to automated processing than quadtree methods which typically require manual tuning. Then, we validate the approach using Sentinel‐1 deformation images from the East African Rift System (EARS). The pre‐processing steps reasonably locate the signal at 15/16 of the EARS volcanoes, and the signal footprint at 14/16. ICA reduces or approximately maintains the image RMS in all cases. Our systematic point source estimates showed consistency when directly compared with previous (bespoke) modeling studies. This approach has the potential to be integrated with existing toolkits for routinely processing and analyzing Sentinel‐1 InSAR data and hence applied globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jb032897
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Systematic Modeling of Volcano Deformation Sources Using Automatically‐Generated InSAR Products

B. Ireland, F. Albino, Juliet Biggs, E. W. Dualeh et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

Toward Systematic Modeling of Volcano Deformation Sources Using Automatically‐Generated InSAR Products

B. Ireland, F. Albino, Juliet Biggs, E. W. Dualeh, N. Anantrasirichai
article en

Abstract

Abstract Volcano deformation measured through Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is ideal for volcano monitoring in many regions due to its global coverage, characteristic spatio‐temporal patterns, and modeling insights. Routinely acquired and processed Sentinel‐1 InSAR datacubes provide the first opportunity to systematically catalog, model and compare volcano deformation globally. Here, we present a framework (GBIS‐BULK) to systematically pre‐process and model volcano deformation signals, designed to be applied to routinely processed InSAR data sets. This requires a robust (semi‐) automated approach to estimate signal locations and footprints for effective pre‐processing and modeling. Our approach combines (a) filtering and clustering to locate the signal center; (b) noise reduction using Independent Component Analysis (ICA); and (c) image classification using Otsu thresholding to delimit the signal footprint. We invert for the best‐fit point source model using constraints from existing global volcano deformation catalogs. First, we examine the influence of downsampling schemes, image noise and coherence using synthetic interferograms, showing nested‐uniform downsampling is more suited to automated processing than quadtree methods which typically require manual tuning. Then, we validate the approach using Sentinel‐1 deformation images from the East African Rift System (EARS). The pre‐processing steps reasonably locate the signal at 15/16 of the EARS volcanoes, and the signal footprint at 14/16. ICA reduces or approximately maintains the image RMS in all cases. Our systematic point source estimates showed consistency when directly compared with previous (bespoke) modeling studies. This approach has the potential to be integrated with existing toolkits for routinely processing and analyzing Sentinel‐1 InSAR data and hence applied globally.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 131(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bristol (GB), Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (GB), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.