Laparoscopic retrieval of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device in a patient presenting with abdominal pain

Uterine perforation is a potentially serious uncommon complication of intrauterine device (IUD) use. It has an incidence of one in 1000 insertions. It can manifest with abnormal uterine bleeding and pain. The most common site of implantation is the omentum. Risk factors include breastfeeding, <6 months postpartum, lack of experience of the healthcare professional, congenital uterine anomalies and nulliparity. Transvaginal ultrasound scan (USS) is accurate in localisation of the Mirena IUD. If the IUD is not evident within the uterus, an abdominal radiograph should be performed. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred method for successfully removing a malpositioned device. The authors present the case of a multiparous woman in her early 20s presenting with abdominal pain and 'lost' Mirena IUD threads. A pelvic USS showed no evidence of an IUD inside the uterus. An abdominal radiograph confirmed the IUD in the pelvis. The IUD was removed laparoscopically and her abdominal pain resolved. This case provides a cautionary reminder that a migrated IUD may cause abdominal pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Case Reports
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2025-271044
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic retrieval of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device in a patient presenting with abdominal pain

Louise Dunphy, Stephanie Boyle, Jeremy Weetch
BMJ Case Reports
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Laparoscopic retrieval of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device in a patient presenting with abdominal pain

Louise Dunphy, Stephanie Boyle, Jeremy Weetch
article en

Abstract

Uterine perforation is a potentially serious uncommon complication of intrauterine device (IUD) use. It has an incidence of one in 1000 insertions. It can manifest with abnormal uterine bleeding and pain. The most common site of implantation is the omentum. Risk factors include breastfeeding, <6 months postpartum, lack of experience of the healthcare professional, congenital uterine anomalies and nulliparity. Transvaginal ultrasound scan (USS) is accurate in localisation of the Mirena IUD. If the IUD is not evident within the uterus, an abdominal radiograph should be performed. Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred method for successfully removing a malpositioned device. The authors present the case of a multiparous woman in her early 20s presenting with abdominal pain and 'lost' Mirena IUD threads. A pelvic USS showed no evidence of an IUD inside the uterus. An abdominal radiograph confirmed the IUD in the pelvis. The IUD was removed laparoscopically and her abdominal pain resolved. This case provides a cautionary reminder that a migrated IUD may cause abdominal pain.

BMJ Case ReportsVol. 19(2)
Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Leighton Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.