Cybersecurity training governance: The SEAL Framework for sustained readiness

Despite substantial investments in cybersecurity awareness training, human error remains a leading source of organizational vulnerability. This study challenges prevailing assumptions by examining how employees perceive various training methods and how these approaches influence cybersecurity readiness across four interdependent levels: individual, team, client, and organization. Contrary to the common belief that training effectiveness depends chiefly on content quality or delivery style, our findings underscore governance—the intentional selection, alignment, timing, and integration of training methods—as the decisive factor in driving cybersecurity readiness. Even when firms implemented comparable, high-quality training content, employee-reported outcomes varied markedly based on how these programs were governed. In response, we propose a cybersecurity training governance framework featuring six actionable recommendations to guide the shift from fragmented awareness initiatives to cohesive readiness strategies. By positioning training governance as a systemic enabler of organizational resilience, this study advocates a fundamental reorientation, from reactive awareness to adaptive readiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Horizons
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2026.02.002
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity training governance: The SEAL Framework for sustained readiness

Morteza Safaeipour, Farzad Fathi, Kaveh Abhari, Nhat Huynh et al.
Business Horizons
Information and Cyber Security
article

Cybersecurity training governance: The SEAL Framework for sustained readiness

Morteza Safaeipour, Farzad Fathi, Kaveh Abhari, Nhat Huynh, Claire Wu
article en

Abstract

Despite substantial investments in cybersecurity awareness training, human error remains a leading source of organizational vulnerability. This study challenges prevailing assumptions by examining how employees perceive various training methods and how these approaches influence cybersecurity readiness across four interdependent levels: individual, team, client, and organization. Contrary to the common belief that training effectiveness depends chiefly on content quality or delivery style, our findings underscore governance—the intentional selection, alignment, timing, and integration of training methods—as the decisive factor in driving cybersecurity readiness. Even when firms implemented comparable, high-quality training content, employee-reported outcomes varied markedly based on how these programs were governed. In response, we propose a cybersecurity training governance framework featuring six actionable recommendations to guide the shift from fragmented awareness initiatives to cohesive readiness strategies. By positioning training governance as a systemic enabler of organizational resilience, this study advocates a fundamental reorientation, from reactive awareness to adaptive readiness.

Business Horizons
Bucknell University (US), San Diego State University (US), PricewaterhouseCoopers (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.