From the AI Act to a European AI Agency: Completing the Union’s Regulatory Architecture

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to advance, effective risk assessment, regulation, and oversight are necessary to ensure that AI development and deployment align with ethical principles while preserving innovation and economic competitiveness. The adoption of the EU AI Act marks an important step in this direction, establishing a harmonised legal framework that includes detailed provisions on AI governance, as well as the creation of the European AI Office. This paper revisits the question of whether a more robust supranational agency dedicated to AI is still warranted and explores how such a body could enhance policy coherence, improve risk assessment capacities, and foster international cooperation. It also argues that a strengthened EU-level agency would also serve the Union’s strategic aim of securing digital and technological sovereignty. Keywords: artificial intelligence, European Union, EU AI Act, supranational agency, AI agency, regulatory fragmentation, risk-based approach, technological sovereignty. DOI: 10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.610 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: G Pavlidis, ‘From the AI Act to a European AI Agency: Completing the Union’s Regulatory Architecture’ (2025) 21 CYELP [ONLINE FIRST].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.610
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From the AI Act to a European AI Agency: Completing the Union’s Regulatory Architecture

Georgios Pavlidis
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From the AI Act to a European AI Agency: Completing the Union’s Regulatory Architecture

Georgios Pavlidis
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to advance, effective risk assessment, regulation, and oversight are necessary to ensure that AI development and deployment align with ethical principles while preserving innovation and economic competitiveness. The adoption of the EU AI Act marks an important step in this direction, establishing a harmonised legal framework that includes detailed provisions on AI governance, as well as the creation of the European AI Office. This paper revisits the question of whether a more robust supranational agency dedicated to AI is still warranted and explores how such a body could enhance policy coherence, improve risk assessment capacities, and foster international cooperation. It also argues that a strengthened EU-level agency would also serve the Union’s strategic aim of securing digital and technological sovereignty. Keywords: artificial intelligence, European Union, EU AI Act, supranational agency, AI agency, regulatory fragmentation, risk-based approach, technological sovereignty. DOI: 10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.610 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: G Pavlidis, ‘From the AI Act to a European AI Agency: Completing the Union’s Regulatory Architecture’ (2025) 21 CYELP [ONLINE FIRST].

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and PolicyVol. 21
Neapolis University Pafos (CY)
European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.