It Takes (At Least) Two to Tango in the Rhythm of AI-Enabled Discrimination: How the AI Act Complements EU Non-Discrimination Law?

Despite the elaborate equality and non-discrimination legislation in the European Union (EU), the current legal framework has been widely deemed ill-suited to properly address discriminatory instances that may emerge from the use of algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Nevertheless, the potential synergies between the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and non-discrimination law remain underexplored. This article suggests that the AI Act may complement EU non-discrimination rules for the purpose of combatting AI-enabled discrimination in a threefold manner: a) by prohibiting certain AI systems that are prone to produce discriminatory outcomes; b) by regulating the requirements that AI systems need to comply with in order to minimise the risk of discrimination; and c) by enabling the persons affected by discriminatory effects to seek legal protection. Each of these prohibitive, regulatory, and enabling functions of the AI Act are examined in turn, with emphasis placed on their interplay with the existing non-discrimination legislation at EU level. Finally, the article concludes that, apart from the significant complementarities between the two legal regimes both at the level of substantive protection granted to individuals and at the level of enforcement, there are other pieces of EU legislation implicated by the AI Act that may also be applicable when addressing AI-enabled discrimination. Keywords: AI Act, non-discrimination law, EU law, bias, complementarity DOI:10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.615 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: K Lamprinoudis, ‘It Takes (At Least) Two to Tango in the Rhythm of AI-Enabled Discrimination: How the AI Act Complements EU Non-Discrimination Law?’ (2025) 21 CYELP [ONLINE FIRST].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Published
2025-12-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.615
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It Takes (At Least) Two to Tango in the Rhythm of AI-Enabled Discrimination: How the AI Act Complements EU Non-Discrimination Law?

Konstantinos Lamprinoudis
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

It Takes (At Least) Two to Tango in the Rhythm of AI-Enabled Discrimination: How the AI Act Complements EU Non-Discrimination Law?

Konstantinos Lamprinoudis
article en

Abstract

Despite the elaborate equality and non-discrimination legislation in the European Union (EU), the current legal framework has been widely deemed ill-suited to properly address discriminatory instances that may emerge from the use of algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. Nevertheless, the potential synergies between the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and non-discrimination law remain underexplored. This article suggests that the AI Act may complement EU non-discrimination rules for the purpose of combatting AI-enabled discrimination in a threefold manner: a) by prohibiting certain AI systems that are prone to produce discriminatory outcomes; b) by regulating the requirements that AI systems need to comply with in order to minimise the risk of discrimination; and c) by enabling the persons affected by discriminatory effects to seek legal protection. Each of these prohibitive, regulatory, and enabling functions of the AI Act are examined in turn, with emphasis placed on their interplay with the existing non-discrimination legislation at EU level. Finally, the article concludes that, apart from the significant complementarities between the two legal regimes both at the level of substantive protection granted to individuals and at the level of enforcement, there are other pieces of EU legislation implicated by the AI Act that may also be applicable when addressing AI-enabled discrimination. Keywords: AI Act, non-discrimination law, EU law, bias, complementarity DOI:10.3935/cyelp.21.2025.615 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution − Non-Commercial − No Derivatives 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: K Lamprinoudis, ‘It Takes (At Least) Two to Tango in the Rhythm of AI-Enabled Discrimination: How the AI Act Complements EU Non-Discrimination Law?’ (2025) 21 CYELP [ONLINE FIRST].

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and PolicyVol. 21
University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.