Analyzing Physics Students’ Misconceptions About Simple Electrical Circuits

This study investigates the prevalence and types of misconceptions among first-year Physics Education students regarding simple electrical circuits using the Simple Electric Circuits Diagnostic Test (SECDT). Employing a quantitative descriptive approach, the research analyzes responses from a sample of 42 students, selected through convenience sampling. The SECDT, a three-tier diagnostic instrument with a reliability of 0.69, identifies student misconceptions by categorizing responses into scientific knowledge, misconceptions, no understanding, and lack of knowledge. The results indicate significant gender differences in the types and prevalence of misconceptions. Male students exhibited a higher percentage of misconceptions (77.5%) compared to female students (62.8%). Notably, female students demonstrated superior scientific understanding (17.7%) relative to their male counterparts (11.7%). Specific misconceptions, such as the clashing current model, were common among both genders, while the attenuation model was the least frequent misconception. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted instructional strategies to address and correct these misconceptions. The SECDT proves to be an effective tool for diagnosing student misconceptions, providing valuable insights for educators. This study suggests that misconceptions in physics education can be mitigated through enhanced diagnostic assessments and tailored teaching approaches

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Sains)/JPS : Jurnal Pendidikan Sains
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17977/2442-3904.1056
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Physics Students’ Misconceptions About Simple Electrical Circuits

Shinta Dewi Susanti, Iwan Setiawan, Sapta Adiguna, Sentot Kusairi
JPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Sains)/JPS : Jurnal Pendidikan Sains
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Analyzing Physics Students’ Misconceptions About Simple Electrical Circuits

Shinta Dewi Susanti, Iwan Setiawan, Sapta Adiguna, Sentot Kusairi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the prevalence and types of misconceptions among first-year Physics Education students regarding simple electrical circuits using the Simple Electric Circuits Diagnostic Test (SECDT). Employing a quantitative descriptive approach, the research analyzes responses from a sample of 42 students, selected through convenience sampling. The SECDT, a three-tier diagnostic instrument with a reliability of 0.69, identifies student misconceptions by categorizing responses into scientific knowledge, misconceptions, no understanding, and lack of knowledge. The results indicate significant gender differences in the types and prevalence of misconceptions. Male students exhibited a higher percentage of misconceptions (77.5%) compared to female students (62.8%). Notably, female students demonstrated superior scientific understanding (17.7%) relative to their male counterparts (11.7%). Specific misconceptions, such as the clashing current model, were common among both genders, while the attenuation model was the least frequent misconception. The findings underscore the critical need for targeted instructional strategies to address and correct these misconceptions. The SECDT proves to be an effective tool for diagnosing student misconceptions, providing valuable insights for educators. This study suggests that misconceptions in physics education can be mitigated through enhanced diagnostic assessments and tailored teaching approaches

JPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Sains)/JPS : Jurnal Pendidikan SainsVol. 11(4)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.