Sustainable Supplier Selection of E‐Commerce Industry in Bangladesh: An Integrated TOPSIS‐AHP Approach

ABSTRACT In Bangladesh's rapidly expanding e‐commerce sector, selecting sustainable suppliers is crucial for ensuring long‐term business viability and environmental accountability. This study develops an integrated decision‐making framework by combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate and rank suppliers based on cost, lead time, environmental impact, labor practices, and social responsibility. Expert judgment was used to assign weights to these criteria using AHP, with environmental impact emerging as the most significant factor. The AHP consistency ratio (CR) was found to be 0.02, indicating acceptable consistency. TOPSIS was then applied to assess 15 suppliers, identifying Supplier K as the most sustainable option, followed by Suppliers C and I. Sensitivity analysis showed that Supplier K consistently ranked #1 in 9 out of 10 different weight scenarios. The final criteria weights were: environmental impact 42.8%, lead time 7%, cost 4%, labor practices 23%, and social responsibility 22%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70636
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable Supplier Selection of E‐Commerce Industry in Bangladesh: An Integrated TOPSIS‐AHP Approach

Hrittik Mural, Monowar Wadud Hridoy, Khandoker Arbab Shahriar
Engineering Reports
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Sustainable Supplier Selection of E‐Commerce Industry in Bangladesh: An Integrated TOPSIS‐AHP Approach

Hrittik Mural, Monowar Wadud Hridoy, Khandoker Arbab Shahriar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Bangladesh's rapidly expanding e‐commerce sector, selecting sustainable suppliers is crucial for ensuring long‐term business viability and environmental accountability. This study develops an integrated decision‐making framework by combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate and rank suppliers based on cost, lead time, environmental impact, labor practices, and social responsibility. Expert judgment was used to assign weights to these criteria using AHP, with environmental impact emerging as the most significant factor. The AHP consistency ratio (CR) was found to be 0.02, indicating acceptable consistency. TOPSIS was then applied to assess 15 suppliers, identifying Supplier K as the most sustainable option, followed by Suppliers C and I. Sensitivity analysis showed that Supplier K consistently ranked #1 in 9 out of 10 different weight scenarios. The final criteria weights were: environmental impact 42.8%, lead time 7%, cost 4%, labor practices 23%, and social responsibility 22%.

Engineering ReportsVol. 8(2)
Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.