Field Observations of Ice Melt and Decay to Constrain Lake Ice Model Parameterizations

ABSTRACT Field measurements within ice covers during the melting period are scarce, often constrained by safety concerns leading to uncertainty in model parameterizations of ice melt. To address these limitations, a Floating Research Station (FRS) was constructed in a small subarctic lake near Yellowknife, Canada to monitor ice processes year‐round. Using the FRS, the objective of this study was to delineate key processes influencing ice melt and decay through evaluating heat budget components over three melt seasons: April 1–May 31 of 2023, 2024, and 2025. Our results show that the decay process was both thermally and mechanically driven, with mechanical decay from ice collapse occurring at internal ice porosities of 0.31–0.35 and accounting for 24%–48% of total ice loss. Thermal melt at the surface (0.6–2.1 cm d −1 ) was driven by surface heat absorption (13–160 W m −2 ) and losses via net longwave fluxes (−95.2 to −6.6 W m −2 ). Bottom melt (0.1–0.6 cm d −1 ) was caused by modest mean daily water‐to‐ice heat fluxes (< 15 W m −2 ). Melt season lengths varied between 35 and 49 days, and break‐up dates up to 16 days, and were dependent on air temperatures, albedo, and net insolation. Results from this study can be used to improve and constrain melt period parameterizations in ice models while providing needed validation and calibration data in northern, high‐latitude environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70430
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field Observations of Ice Melt and Decay to Constrain Lake Ice Model Parameterizations

Chris Spence, Homa Kheyrollah Pour, Arash Rafat
Hydrological Processes
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Field Observations of Ice Melt and Decay to Constrain Lake Ice Model Parameterizations

Chris Spence, Homa Kheyrollah Pour, Arash Rafat
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Field measurements within ice covers during the melting period are scarce, often constrained by safety concerns leading to uncertainty in model parameterizations of ice melt. To address these limitations, a Floating Research Station (FRS) was constructed in a small subarctic lake near Yellowknife, Canada to monitor ice processes year‐round. Using the FRS, the objective of this study was to delineate key processes influencing ice melt and decay through evaluating heat budget components over three melt seasons: April 1–May 31 of 2023, 2024, and 2025. Our results show that the decay process was both thermally and mechanically driven, with mechanical decay from ice collapse occurring at internal ice porosities of 0.31–0.35 and accounting for 24%–48% of total ice loss. Thermal melt at the surface (0.6–2.1 cm d −1 ) was driven by surface heat absorption (13–160 W m −2 ) and losses via net longwave fluxes (−95.2 to −6.6 W m −2 ). Bottom melt (0.1–0.6 cm d −1 ) was caused by modest mean daily water‐to‐ice heat fluxes (< 15 W m −2 ). Melt season lengths varied between 35 and 49 days, and break‐up dates up to 16 days, and were dependent on air temperatures, albedo, and net insolation. Results from this study can be used to improve and constrain melt period parameterizations in ice models while providing needed validation and calibration data in northern, high‐latitude environments.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 40(2)
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.