Expert-level probabilistic breathing event detector informs phenotyping of sleep apnea

Diagnosing sleep disordered breathing requires manual annotation of events from sleep studies, such as nocturnal polysomnography, a process that is time-intensive, costly, and prone to inter-rater variability. Automatic approaches exist but lack generalizability due to signal variability across centers. We develop an automatic apneic breathing event detector to localize and classify obstructive apneas, central apneas, hypopneas, and isolated respiratory events without arousals or desaturations. The model is trained on 5456 polysomnographies and tested on 1099 polysomnographies from six cohorts uses an end-to-end deep learning architecture. The model's predictions show a strong correlation with expert annotations for apnea-hypopnea index (r² = 0.84) and achieve an F1 score of 0.78 across apnea event types, with specific F1 scores of 0.71, 0.51, and 0.65 for obstructive apnea, central apnea, and hypopnea events, respectively. In two independent, multi-scored datasets, The model performs comparably or better than individual expert raters. The model's probabilistic output, termed "apnotyping," provides insights into sleep disordered breathing etiology, with event probabilities correlating more strongly with key sleep apnea traits-such as loop gain and pharyngeal muscle compensation-than traditional apnea indexes. This probabilistic approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy and support personalized treatment strategies, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69163-z
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert-level probabilistic breathing event detector informs phenotyping of sleep apnea

Umaer Hanif, Andreas Brink-Kjær, SA Sands, Oliver Sum-Ping et al.
Nature Communications
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Expert-level probabilistic breathing event detector informs phenotyping of sleep apnea

Umaer Hanif, Andreas Brink-Kjær, SA Sands, Oliver Sum-Ping, Oscar Carrillo, Magnus Ruud Kjær, K. Stone, E. Mignot, M. Olsen, P. Jennum, Susan Redline
article en

Abstract

Diagnosing sleep disordered breathing requires manual annotation of events from sleep studies, such as nocturnal polysomnography, a process that is time-intensive, costly, and prone to inter-rater variability. Automatic approaches exist but lack generalizability due to signal variability across centers. We develop an automatic apneic breathing event detector to localize and classify obstructive apneas, central apneas, hypopneas, and isolated respiratory events without arousals or desaturations. The model is trained on 5456 polysomnographies and tested on 1099 polysomnographies from six cohorts uses an end-to-end deep learning architecture. The model's predictions show a strong correlation with expert annotations for apnea-hypopnea index (r² = 0.84) and achieve an F1 score of 0.78 across apnea event types, with specific F1 scores of 0.71, 0.51, and 0.65 for obstructive apnea, central apnea, and hypopnea events, respectively. In two independent, multi-scored datasets, The model performs comparably or better than individual expert raters. The model's probabilistic output, termed "apnotyping," provides insights into sleep disordered breathing etiology, with event probabilities correlating more strongly with key sleep apnea traits-such as loop gain and pharyngeal muscle compensation-than traditional apnea indexes. This probabilistic approach may enhance diagnostic accuracy and support personalized treatment strategies, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), California Pacific Medical Center (US), Glostrup Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Stanford Medicine (US), Circadian (United States) (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK), Stanford University (US)
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.