Risk Event Experience and Household Consumption Behavior: Based on the Perspective of Group and Individual Differences

From the perspective of the difference between group and individual risk events, this paper makes a comparative study of the impact of two types of risk event experiences on household consumption behavior and the mechanisms behind it. Based on CHFS nationally representative 5-round unbalanced panel microdata, we conduct a detailed empirical analysis using the PSM-DID method. We find that group risk experience and individual risk experience have entirely different impacts on household consumption behavior. Households experiencing individual risk events exhibit a significant increase in total consumption, particularly in medical expenditure, whereas households experiencing group risk events do not display significant changes in their consumption behavior. Further analysis shows that the lack of sufficient government support and limited social interaction for households experiencing individual risk events are key reasons for the differences in consumption behavior between the two types of households. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that changes in household consumption after risk events vary depending on factors such as household support burdens, government medical security levels, and social characteristics. The conclusion of this paper shows that government relief and social interaction positively affect households’ consumption behavior, and the government needs to fully consider the differences between different types of risks when formulating risk treatment measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
经济学报.
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/cje.2025.9300413
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Event Experience and Household Consumption Behavior: Based on the Perspective of Group and Individual Differences

Yisheng Lu, Xiaomeng Lu, Yaling Li
经济学报.
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Risk Event Experience and Household Consumption Behavior: Based on the Perspective of Group and Individual Differences

Yisheng Lu, Xiaomeng Lu, Yaling Li
article en

Abstract

From the perspective of the difference between group and individual risk events, this paper makes a comparative study of the impact of two types of risk event experiences on household consumption behavior and the mechanisms behind it. Based on CHFS nationally representative 5-round unbalanced panel microdata, we conduct a detailed empirical analysis using the PSM-DID method. We find that group risk experience and individual risk experience have entirely different impacts on household consumption behavior. Households experiencing individual risk events exhibit a significant increase in total consumption, particularly in medical expenditure, whereas households experiencing group risk events do not display significant changes in their consumption behavior. Further analysis shows that the lack of sufficient government support and limited social interaction for households experiencing individual risk events are key reasons for the differences in consumption behavior between the two types of households. The heterogeneity analysis indicates that changes in household consumption after risk events vary depending on factors such as household support burdens, government medical security levels, and social characteristics. The conclusion of this paper shows that government relief and social interaction positively affect households’ consumption behavior, and the government needs to fully consider the differences between different types of risks when formulating risk treatment measures.

经济学报.Vol. 12(4)
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Sichuan University (CN), China Construction Bank (CN), Bank of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.