Field Note: What Motivates Forest Landowners to Participate in Surveys? Lessons from a Methodological Experiment in the Southern United States

Abstract Surveys of family forest landowners commonly have low response rates, raising concerns about potential response bias and limited statistical power due to small sample sizes. This field note reports on a methodological experiment embedded in a survey of private forest landowners conducted in 2023 in the southern United States. The experiment consisted of six treatments combining three survey modes (web-only, mail-only, and push-to-the-web) and two incentive types (raffle lotteries for gift cards and $2 bill for mail-only). None of the treatments resulted in response rates over 10%. Mail-only treatments with a $2 bill incentive had the highest response rates, reaching up to 8%. Web-only treatments, even when incentivized, were less effective. Our findings emphasize the value of mixed-mode approaches and tangible incentives for engaging forest landowners in surveys. We also provide practical insights and guidance for researchers and policymakers to improve data collection in natural resource contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forestry
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44392-025-00061-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field Note: What Motivates Forest Landowners to Participate in Surveys? Lessons from a Methodological Experiment in the Southern United States

Ana Cubas-Báez, Rajan Parajuli, Erin O. Sills
1 citations
Journal of Forestry
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
article

Field Note: What Motivates Forest Landowners to Participate in Surveys? Lessons from a Methodological Experiment in the Southern United States

Ana Cubas-Báez, Rajan Parajuli, Erin O. Sills
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Surveys of family forest landowners commonly have low response rates, raising concerns about potential response bias and limited statistical power due to small sample sizes. This field note reports on a methodological experiment embedded in a survey of private forest landowners conducted in 2023 in the southern United States. The experiment consisted of six treatments combining three survey modes (web-only, mail-only, and push-to-the-web) and two incentive types (raffle lotteries for gift cards and $2 bill for mail-only). None of the treatments resulted in response rates over 10%. Mail-only treatments with a $2 bill incentive had the highest response rates, reaching up to 8%. Web-only treatments, even when incentivized, were less effective. Our findings emphasize the value of mixed-mode approaches and tangible incentives for engaging forest landowners in surveys. We also provide practical insights and guidance for researchers and policymakers to improve data collection in natural resource contexts.

Journal of ForestryVol. 124(2)
North Carolina State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Field Note: What Motivates Forest Landowners to Participate in Surveys? Lessons from a Methodological Experiment in the Southern United States — Ana Cubas-Báez, Rajan Parajuli, et al. · Journal of Forestry (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS