Delivery Outcomes after Centering versus Routine Prenatal Care

The objective of this study was to compare delivery outcomes among women in Northern Manhattan undergoing Centering versus routine prenatal care.This retrospective cohort study analyzed prenatal care and delivery hospitalizations among women receiving prenatal care at two ambulatory clinics in Northern Manhattan from 2013 to 2018. The exposure of interest was Centering versus routine prenatal care. The primary outcome of interest was preterm birth <37 weeks. Other clinical outcomes analyzed included number of prenatal visits, birth weight including very low birth weight (<1,500 g), cesarean versus vaginal delivery, and preterm birth at <32 weeks. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models (accounting for demographic factors) were performed to analyze the association between the exposure of Centering prenatal care and the primary outcome with unadjusted (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of association.A total of 714 women undergoing Centering prenatal care and 9,469 women undergoing traditional prenatal care were included in the analysis. Evaluating the primary outcome of preterm birth at <37 weeks, Centering was associated with a 5.9% risk of preterm birth compared to 7.1% with routine prenatal care (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.53-1.30). Centering prenatal care was also not significantly associated with very low birth weight (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-1.7), birth weight <2,500 g (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.06), or preterm birth at 32 to 36 weeks (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.2). Centering prenatal care was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.84) and more frequent prenatal visits.Centering prenatal care was associated with lower likelihood of cesarean delivery and more frequent prenatal visits, while likelihood of preterm birth and low birth weight were not significantly more or less likely with Centering. · Centering prenatal care was associated with lower likelihood of cesarean delivery.. · Centering prenatal care was associated with more frequent prenatal visits.. · Preterm birth and low birth weight were not significantly more or less likely with Centering..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2807-4439
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delivery Outcomes after Centering versus Routine Prenatal Care

Joel Agarwal, Dahsan Gary, Sarah Kelly, Alyssa Wynn et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Delivery Outcomes after Centering versus Routine Prenatal Care

Joel Agarwal, Dahsan Gary, Sarah Kelly, Alyssa Wynn, Alexander Michael Friedman, Ilya Goldstein
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare delivery outcomes among women in Northern Manhattan undergoing Centering versus routine prenatal care.This retrospective cohort study analyzed prenatal care and delivery hospitalizations among women receiving prenatal care at two ambulatory clinics in Northern Manhattan from 2013 to 2018. The exposure of interest was Centering versus routine prenatal care. The primary outcome of interest was preterm birth <37 weeks. Other clinical outcomes analyzed included number of prenatal visits, birth weight including very low birth weight (<1,500 g), cesarean versus vaginal delivery, and preterm birth at <32 weeks. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models (accounting for demographic factors) were performed to analyze the association between the exposure of Centering prenatal care and the primary outcome with unadjusted (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of association.A total of 714 women undergoing Centering prenatal care and 9,469 women undergoing traditional prenatal care were included in the analysis. Evaluating the primary outcome of preterm birth at <37 weeks, Centering was associated with a 5.9% risk of preterm birth compared to 7.1% with routine prenatal care (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.53-1.30). Centering prenatal care was also not significantly associated with very low birth weight (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-1.7), birth weight <2,500 g (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.06), or preterm birth at 32 to 36 weeks (OR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.2). Centering prenatal care was associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.84) and more frequent prenatal visits.Centering prenatal care was associated with lower likelihood of cesarean delivery and more frequent prenatal visits, while likelihood of preterm birth and low birth weight were not significantly more or less likely with Centering. · Centering prenatal care was associated with lower likelihood of cesarean delivery.. · Centering prenatal care was associated with more frequent prenatal visits.. · Preterm birth and low birth weight were not significantly more or less likely with Centering..

American Journal of Perinatology
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.