Why Paternalism Is Wrong (When It Is Wrong)

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a novel reinterpretation of the familiar, if inchoate, thought that paternalism offends against an ideal of personal sovereignty. The central idea is that (competent) persons have a particular kind of normative power. Just as each of us has the right to control how others are permitted to use our bodies or property, we each have a structurally similar right to control how others are permitted to use our good . When others seek to benefit us without adequately consulting our will, they trespass into a domain that is ours to control, treating us as lacking rights that we in fact have. The paper argues that this theory of anti‐paternalism is superior to existing accounts, is independently attractive, and rests on deeper foundations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.70099
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Paternalism Is Wrong (When It Is Wrong)

Jonathan Parry
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Why Paternalism Is Wrong (When It Is Wrong)

Jonathan Parry
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a novel reinterpretation of the familiar, if inchoate, thought that paternalism offends against an ideal of personal sovereignty. The central idea is that (competent) persons have a particular kind of normative power. Just as each of us has the right to control how others are permitted to use our bodies or property, we each have a structurally similar right to control how others are permitted to use our good . When others seek to benefit us without adequately consulting our will, they trespass into a domain that is ours to control, treating us as lacking rights that we in fact have. The paper argues that this theory of anti‐paternalism is superior to existing accounts, is independently attractive, and rests on deeper foundations.

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
London School of Economics and Political Science, Government of the United Kingdom, UK Research and Innovation, University of Southampton, University of Warwick, University of Leeds, Durham University, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.