The Influence of Learning Models (PjBL & PBL) And Learning Styles (Visual & Auditory) on Biology Learning Outcomes

This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in biology learning outcomes between students taught with PJBL (project based learning) learning model and biology learning outcomes of students taught with PBL (problem based learning) learning model (2) Differences in biology learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style and who have an auditorial learning style, (3) interaction between learning models and learning styles on biology learning outcomes. The research method used a quasi- experimental method with a research design = faktorial 2 x 2. The data analysis technique used two-way ANOVA at a significant level of 0.05. The results showed that: From the results of the hypothesis obtained sig value in hypothesis 1, namely the learning model 0.005 <0.004 means it can be concluded that there is a difference in the ability of learning outcomes given the PJBL AND PBL learning model, from the sig value in hypothesis 2 learning style 0.671>0.005 it can be concluded that there is no difference in the ability of learning outcomes of students with audio and visual learning styles and from the significant value in hypothesis 3 interaction between learning models and learning styles with a value of 0.766>0.005 there is no effect of interaction between learning models with learning styles on student learning outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian dan Pengembangan
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17977/2502-471x.1082
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Learning Models (PjBL & PBL) And Learning Styles (Visual & Auditory) on Biology Learning Outcomes

Adam Smith Bago, Agsen H.S. Billik, I Gede Ratnaya, Rosalina S.S. Son
Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian dan Pengembangan
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

The Influence of Learning Models (PjBL & PBL) And Learning Styles (Visual & Auditory) on Biology Learning Outcomes

Adam Smith Bago, Agsen H.S. Billik, I Gede Ratnaya, Rosalina S.S. Son
article en

Abstract

This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in biology learning outcomes between students taught with PJBL (project based learning) learning model and biology learning outcomes of students taught with PBL (problem based learning) learning model (2) Differences in biology learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style and who have an auditorial learning style, (3) interaction between learning models and learning styles on biology learning outcomes. The research method used a quasi- experimental method with a research design = faktorial 2 x 2. The data analysis technique used two-way ANOVA at a significant level of 0.05. The results showed that: From the results of the hypothesis obtained sig value in hypothesis 1, namely the learning model 0.005 <0.004 means it can be concluded that there is a difference in the ability of learning outcomes given the PJBL AND PBL learning model, from the sig value in hypothesis 2 learning style 0.671>0.005 it can be concluded that there is no difference in the ability of learning outcomes of students with audio and visual learning styles and from the significant value in hypothesis 3 interaction between learning models and learning styles with a value of 0.766>0.005 there is no effect of interaction between learning models with learning styles on student learning outcomes.

Jurnal Pendidikan Teori Penelitian dan PengembanganVol. 9(6)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.