“I feel like I am losing myself”: protection, ontological in/security, and queer/trans refugees in Turkey

Abstract This article explores the protection of queer/trans refugees under temporary asylum in Turkey. It argues that the existing international asylum and refugee regime falls short of adequately protecting queer and trans refugees because of its narrow understanding of security. The regime tends to privilege physical security and offers protection in “emergency” cases in which immediate threats endanger bodily safety. While doing so, it neglects ontological security—the sense of stability and continuity that arises from maintaining one's queer/trans identity and agency. An exclusive focus on physical security has two key implications: it obscures how systemic and structural inequalities and discrimination undermine refugees’ ontological security, and it transforms protection into a mechanism of control, discipline, and containment. The article conceptualizes protection as a contested category continually negotiated by states, international organizations, NGOs, and queer/trans refugees. The meaning of protection shifts across a continuum of varied, and sometimes contradictory, layers of physical and ontological in/security. Methodologically, an interpretivist approach is adopted to analyze how the state, NGO professionals, and queer and trans refugees negotiate the meanings attached to security and protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Security Dialogue
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/secdia/xhaf004
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I feel like I am losing myself”: protection, ontological in/security, and queer/trans refugees in Turkey

Doğu Durgun
Security Dialogue
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

“I feel like I am losing myself”: protection, ontological in/security, and queer/trans refugees in Turkey

Doğu Durgun
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the protection of queer/trans refugees under temporary asylum in Turkey. It argues that the existing international asylum and refugee regime falls short of adequately protecting queer and trans refugees because of its narrow understanding of security. The regime tends to privilege physical security and offers protection in “emergency” cases in which immediate threats endanger bodily safety. While doing so, it neglects ontological security—the sense of stability and continuity that arises from maintaining one's queer/trans identity and agency. An exclusive focus on physical security has two key implications: it obscures how systemic and structural inequalities and discrimination undermine refugees’ ontological security, and it transforms protection into a mechanism of control, discipline, and containment. The article conceptualizes protection as a contested category continually negotiated by states, international organizations, NGOs, and queer/trans refugees. The meaning of protection shifts across a continuum of varied, and sometimes contradictory, layers of physical and ontological in/security. Methodologically, an interpretivist approach is adopted to analyze how the state, NGO professionals, and queer and trans refugees negotiate the meanings attached to security and protection.

Security Dialogue
Kadir Has University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.