Learning to walk the tightrope: Navigating the scientist-practitioner model – An assistant psychologist’s perspective

A hallmark of doctorate training in clinical psychology is the reflective scientist practitioner model (British Psychological Society, 2019). This paper presents an assistant psychologist’s reflections on learning to incorporate the model into personal development and clinical practice, while working in an NHS clinical neuropsychology department. With reference to clinical examples and broader critiques, it explores the tensions inherent in the model and highlights challenges that can come when applying it to clinical practice – particularly for aspiring psychologists yet to complete doctorate training. Critically reflecting on the model can help prevent internalising its inconsistencies as shortcomings in personal competence. It concludes by discussing how a particular psychological theory helped to illuminate a clearer perspective and suggests how these reflections could be used in supervision to enhance the development of assistant psychologists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychology Forum
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2025.1.394.19
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to walk the tightrope: Navigating the scientist-practitioner model – An assistant psychologist’s perspective

Lee Fletcher
Clinical Psychology Forum
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Learning to walk the tightrope: Navigating the scientist-practitioner model – An assistant psychologist’s perspective

Lee Fletcher
article en

Abstract

A hallmark of doctorate training in clinical psychology is the reflective scientist practitioner model (British Psychological Society, 2019). This paper presents an assistant psychologist’s reflections on learning to incorporate the model into personal development and clinical practice, while working in an NHS clinical neuropsychology department. With reference to clinical examples and broader critiques, it explores the tensions inherent in the model and highlights challenges that can come when applying it to clinical practice – particularly for aspiring psychologists yet to complete doctorate training. Critically reflecting on the model can help prevent internalising its inconsistencies as shortcomings in personal competence. It concludes by discussing how a particular psychological theory helped to illuminate a clearer perspective and suggests how these reflections could be used in supervision to enhance the development of assistant psychologists.

Clinical Psychology ForumVol. 1(394)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.