What Can Space-time Emergence Teach Us About Consciousness?

Schneider and Bailey’s ‘Superpsychism’ advances the prototime interpretation of quantum mechanics, on which entanglement unfolds in a non-spatio-temporal arena. By locating maximal consciousness at this fundamental level, they aim to gain leverage over both physicalism and cosmopsychism. I argue, however, that the view encounters two issues. First, if the fundamental level is nonspatio-temporal, our conception of the physical becomes unstable. At best one could redescribe what remains as a thin negative gap, but even that residual puzzle carries little dialectical force, reflecting ignorance rather than any principled contrast. Second, the contrast between superpsychism and cosmopsychism cannot rely on scale once space-time is set aside; recast mereologically, it shows no clear advantage for superpsychism, and in fact risks collapsing into cosmopsychism unless further argument is supplied. The broader lesson is that the prototime framework points more generally, and at least prima facie, toward non-spatio-temporal monism, while leaving open the task of showing whether and why superpsychism should be preferred within the family of monist views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.33.1.160
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Can Space-time Emergence Teach Us About Consciousness?

Baptiste Le Bihan
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
article

What Can Space-time Emergence Teach Us About Consciousness?

Baptiste Le Bihan
article en

Abstract

Schneider and Bailey’s ‘Superpsychism’ advances the prototime interpretation of quantum mechanics, on which entanglement unfolds in a non-spatio-temporal arena. By locating maximal consciousness at this fundamental level, they aim to gain leverage over both physicalism and cosmopsychism. I argue, however, that the view encounters two issues. First, if the fundamental level is nonspatio-temporal, our conception of the physical becomes unstable. At best one could redescribe what remains as a thin negative gap, but even that residual puzzle carries little dialectical force, reflecting ignorance rather than any principled contrast. Second, the contrast between superpsychism and cosmopsychism cannot rely on scale once space-time is set aside; recast mereologically, it shows no clear advantage for superpsychism, and in fact risks collapsing into cosmopsychism unless further argument is supplied. The broader lesson is that the prototime framework points more generally, and at least prima facie, toward non-spatio-temporal monism, while leaving open the task of showing whether and why superpsychism should be preferred within the family of monist views.

Journal of Consciousness StudiesVol. 33(1)
University of Geneva (CH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.