Bowel Preparation Plus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Alone for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Comparative Study

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy affecting men beyond middle age. In developed countries, the life time risk of developing microscopic prostate cancer in men is 30%. Prostate cancer is a slow-growing tumor and the risk of developing clinical disease is 16% with 3% lifetime risk of dying from the disease. Prostate biopsy serves as a means for obtaining specimen for cancer diagnosis. The procedure though relatively simple and safe may result in complications hence the need to take some precautions during patient preparation. There is wide variability in the workup protocol amongst urologist with no consensus. The aim of this study was to compare bowel preparation plus antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotic prophylaxis alone in reducing the infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy. Methodology: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Group I had bowel preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis while group II received antibiotic prophylaxis only. Both groups were followed up and assessed for complications. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Data were presented using tables and figures and p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 106 men were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized into two groups. Group I had 54 subjects while group II had 52 subjects. Age range was 48-96 years with a mean age of 65.4±10.4 years. Both groups had comparable socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall Infective complication in this study was seen in 72 (67.9%). Incidence of significant complication requiring hospitalization was seen in 5 (4.7%). For group I infective complication was seen in 28 (51.8%) while for group II 47 (90.2%) patients had infective complications (p = 0.009). The incidence of significant complications requiring hospitalization was 2 (3.7%) for group I and 3 (5.8%) for group II (p = 0.675). Conclusion: Overall there is statistically significant difference between the use of bowel preparation plus antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotic prophylaxis alone in reducing the infective complication following transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcocr.20261101.13
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bowel Preparation Plus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Alone for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Comparative Study

Obiatuegwu Kenenna, Ramyil Venyir, Alobu Emeka, Magnus Felix et al.
International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Bowel Preparation Plus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Versus Antibiotic Prophylaxis Alone for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Comparative Study

Obiatuegwu Kenenna, Ramyil Venyir, Alobu Emeka, Magnus Felix, Aisuodionoe-Shadrach Oseremen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is a common malignancy affecting men beyond middle age. In developed countries, the life time risk of developing microscopic prostate cancer in men is 30%. Prostate cancer is a slow-growing tumor and the risk of developing clinical disease is 16% with 3% lifetime risk of dying from the disease. Prostate biopsy serves as a means for obtaining specimen for cancer diagnosis. The procedure though relatively simple and safe may result in complications hence the need to take some precautions during patient preparation. There is wide variability in the workup protocol amongst urologist with no consensus. The aim of this study was to compare bowel preparation plus antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotic prophylaxis alone in reducing the infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy. Methodology: Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Group I had bowel preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis while group II received antibiotic prophylaxis only. Both groups were followed up and assessed for complications. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS Version 20. Data were presented using tables and figures and p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 106 men were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomized into two groups. Group I had 54 subjects while group II had 52 subjects. Age range was 48-96 years with a mean age of 65.4±10.4 years. Both groups had comparable socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall Infective complication in this study was seen in 72 (67.9%). Incidence of significant complication requiring hospitalization was seen in 5 (4.7%). For group I infective complication was seen in 28 (51.8%) while for group II 47 (90.2%) patients had infective complications (p = 0.009). The incidence of significant complications requiring hospitalization was 2 (3.7%) for group I and 3 (5.8%) for group II (p = 0.675). Conclusion: Overall there is statistically significant difference between the use of bowel preparation plus antibiotic prophylaxis versus antibiotic prophylaxis alone in reducing the infective complication following transrectal prostate biopsy.

International Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer ResearchVol. 11(1)
National Hospital Abuja (NG), Federal Medical Centre (NG), University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (NG), Jos University Teaching Hospital (NG), University of Abuja (NG)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.