Backstage Participation: Mess and Muddle in Youth-Focused, Arts-Based Mental Health Research

This paper introduces two methodological innovations designed to enhance the transparency, ethics, and creative rigor of youth-focused participatory research in mental health. First, we conceptualize ‘Invisible Ink’ as a metaphor for latent participant knowledge—insights rooted in lived experience that remain hidden without specific relational and analytic scaffolds. Second, we model ‘Backstage Cafés as emergent, informal third spaces where young people, researchers, and practitioners co-create trust, surface vulnerabilities, and negotiate power relations before stepping into formal research activities. Drawing on co-authored reflections from the UKRI-funded Attune and Create projects ( n ≈ 200 participants, aged 10–24), we demonstrate how these tools operated across two iterative phases: (1) collaborative inquiry into ‘meaningful mess’—where uncertainty and vulnerability fuel creative exploration—and (2) management of ‘messy muddles’—complex ethical dilemmas and role ambiguities that arose in real time. Through a six-stage writing process combining surveys, interviews, collaborative coding, and a residential retreat, we illustrate how Invisible Ink and Backstage Cafés enabled genuine co-production of methodological insights, flattened traditional hierarchies, and sustained participant agency throughout data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Implications for qualitative and mixed-methods researchers include guidelines for integrating unstructured relational spaces, deliberately surfacing hidden contributions, and maintaining ethical reflexivity in long-term participatory endeavours. By foregrounding the dynamics of backstage processes, the behind-the-scenes activities that support the public facing participatory work, this paper advances participatory methodology beyond static frameworks toward a fluid, ethically accountable paradigm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251410344
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backstage Participation: Mess and Muddle in Youth-Focused, Arts-Based Mental Health Research

Paul Cooke, Nicola Shaughnessy, Dong‐Yun Lee, Anna Mankee-Williams et al.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Backstage Participation: Mess and Muddle in Youth-Focused, Arts-Based Mental Health Research

Paul Cooke, Nicola Shaughnessy, Dong‐Yun Lee, Anna Mankee-Williams, Syeda Sana Batool, Imogen Warren, Nina Piotrowska, Srhya Lalh, Jack Hanrahan, Grace Bennett, Siobhan Hugh-Jones
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces two methodological innovations designed to enhance the transparency, ethics, and creative rigor of youth-focused participatory research in mental health. First, we conceptualize ‘Invisible Ink’ as a metaphor for latent participant knowledge—insights rooted in lived experience that remain hidden without specific relational and analytic scaffolds. Second, we model ‘Backstage Cafés as emergent, informal third spaces where young people, researchers, and practitioners co-create trust, surface vulnerabilities, and negotiate power relations before stepping into formal research activities. Drawing on co-authored reflections from the UKRI-funded Attune and Create projects ( n ≈ 200 participants, aged 10–24), we demonstrate how these tools operated across two iterative phases: (1) collaborative inquiry into ‘meaningful mess’—where uncertainty and vulnerability fuel creative exploration—and (2) management of ‘messy muddles’—complex ethical dilemmas and role ambiguities that arose in real time. Through a six-stage writing process combining surveys, interviews, collaborative coding, and a residential retreat, we illustrate how Invisible Ink and Backstage Cafés enabled genuine co-production of methodological insights, flattened traditional hierarchies, and sustained participant agency throughout data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Implications for qualitative and mixed-methods researchers include guidelines for integrating unstructured relational spaces, deliberately surfacing hidden contributions, and maintaining ethical reflexivity in long-term participatory endeavours. By foregrounding the dynamics of backstage processes, the behind-the-scenes activities that support the public facing participatory work, this paper advances participatory methodology beyond static frameworks toward a fluid, ethically accountable paradigm.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
University of Leeds (GB), University of Bradford (GB), University of Sussex (GB), Falmouth University (GB), University of Kent (GB), Cornwall Council (GB), De Montfort University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.