Anatomizing Hiroshima mon amour (1959): Deleuze’s Cinematic Fossil as an Instrument of Human Rights Advocacy

Replete with images of bodies desecrated by the atomic bombing, Alain Resnais’s Hiroshima mon amour (1959) testifies to the vulnerability of the human form to wounding and mutilation, and thereby affirms the protection of the body as the most sacrosanct task of human rights. Bringing into dialog the pragmatist view of human rights as a safeguard against politically induced suffering with Gilles Deleuze’s analysis of cinematic form, this article posits Resnais’s film as a cinematic fossil in Deleuze’s sense: an image that, by way of a haptic, indexical visuality, conscripts the viewer’s own body as a sensorial witness to trauma. If, as moral anthropological approaches suggest, our conviction in human rights arises not from reason or doctrine but from the felt experience of pain, then the cinematic fossil merits consideration as an instrument for generating the embodied solidarity that ought to underpin our modern human rights regime.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Film Matters
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/fm_00404_1
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomizing Hiroshima mon amour (1959): Deleuze’s Cinematic Fossil as an Instrument of Human Rights Advocacy

Vernita Zhai
Film Matters
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
article

Anatomizing Hiroshima mon amour (1959): Deleuze’s Cinematic Fossil as an Instrument of Human Rights Advocacy

Vernita Zhai
article en

Abstract

Replete with images of bodies desecrated by the atomic bombing, Alain Resnais’s Hiroshima mon amour (1959) testifies to the vulnerability of the human form to wounding and mutilation, and thereby affirms the protection of the body as the most sacrosanct task of human rights. Bringing into dialog the pragmatist view of human rights as a safeguard against politically induced suffering with Gilles Deleuze’s analysis of cinematic form, this article posits Resnais’s film as a cinematic fossil in Deleuze’s sense: an image that, by way of a haptic, indexical visuality, conscripts the viewer’s own body as a sensorial witness to trauma. If, as moral anthropological approaches suggest, our conviction in human rights arises not from reason or doctrine but from the felt experience of pain, then the cinematic fossil merits consideration as an instrument for generating the embodied solidarity that ought to underpin our modern human rights regime.

Film MattersVol. 16(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.