Between-school inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula in a marketized education system: The case of Australia

Increasing the participation of students who study science and mathematics curricula is a priority in many countries, but between-school inequalities in the offerings of these subjects is not well understood. We examine stratified opportunities to learn science and math subjects in upper secondary schools in Australia, as a case study for examining how educational marketization reduces access to curricular subjects in comprehensive secondary education systems. Using census data from one state, we found biology and chemistry are offered in most schools, but substantial inequalities exist in access to physics and especially advanced mathematics. School size, socioeconomic composition, sector and location predict whether a school offers advanced mathematics. The findings suggest that inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula are patterned by social background and that these inequalities are linked with educational marketization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Comparative and International Education
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999261422007
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between-school inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula in a marketized education system: The case of Australia

Christopher Lubienski, Steve Murphy, Laura B. Perry, Philip Roberts
Research in Comparative and International Education
School Choice and Performance
article

Between-school inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula in a marketized education system: The case of Australia

Christopher Lubienski, Steve Murphy, Laura B. Perry, Philip Roberts
article en

Abstract

Increasing the participation of students who study science and mathematics curricula is a priority in many countries, but between-school inequalities in the offerings of these subjects is not well understood. We examine stratified opportunities to learn science and math subjects in upper secondary schools in Australia, as a case study for examining how educational marketization reduces access to curricular subjects in comprehensive secondary education systems. Using census data from one state, we found biology and chemistry are offered in most schools, but substantial inequalities exist in access to physics and especially advanced mathematics. School size, socioeconomic composition, sector and location predict whether a school offers advanced mathematics. The findings suggest that inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula are patterned by social background and that these inequalities are linked with educational marketization.

Research in Comparative and International Education
Murdoch University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Latrobe Regional Hospital (AU), Indiana University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between-school inequalities in access to science and mathematics curricula in a marketized education system: The case of Australia — Christopher Lubienski, Steve Murphy, et al. · Research in Comparative and International Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS