To Infrastructure the Future

ABSTRACT This commentary describes how geographers can consider the intersection between infrastructural systems and future‐making. The ability of different groups to envision the future varies significantly. The stakes are high as certain futures made available to some are denied to others. Questions regarding who has the capacity to imagine and materialise infrastructural futures—as well as who can see what futures over what spatial and temporal horizons—are both inherently political and profoundly challenging. The commentary offers a simple heuristic framework to suggest how geographers might conceive and unlock the potential of alternative modalities of infrastructure‐based futuring to make a difference to how policy and action unfold in spatial future‐making. Arising from empirical research on regional infrastructure planning, we focus on how regional diverse publics and planners understand and materialise infrastructural futures, paying particular attention to (1) who gets to think about what futures; (2) with what tools; and (3) over what timeframes. In doing so, we consider opportunities to bridge disconnects between top‐down planning and everyday usage and enhance the long‐term viability of regional infrastructure futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Journal
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.70071
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Infrastructure the Future

Michael R. Glass, Jean‐Paul D. Addie
Geographical Journal
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

To Infrastructure the Future

Michael R. Glass, Jean‐Paul D. Addie
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This commentary describes how geographers can consider the intersection between infrastructural systems and future‐making. The ability of different groups to envision the future varies significantly. The stakes are high as certain futures made available to some are denied to others. Questions regarding who has the capacity to imagine and materialise infrastructural futures—as well as who can see what futures over what spatial and temporal horizons—are both inherently political and profoundly challenging. The commentary offers a simple heuristic framework to suggest how geographers might conceive and unlock the potential of alternative modalities of infrastructure‐based futuring to make a difference to how policy and action unfold in spatial future‐making. Arising from empirical research on regional infrastructure planning, we focus on how regional diverse publics and planners understand and materialise infrastructural futures, paying particular attention to (1) who gets to think about what futures; (2) with what tools; and (3) over what timeframes. In doing so, we consider opportunities to bridge disconnects between top‐down planning and everyday usage and enhance the long‐term viability of regional infrastructure futures.

Geographical Journal
University of Pittsburgh (US), Georgia State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.