Incidental Adnexal Lesions: CT Diagnosis and Interreader Agreement

Background The management of incidental adnexal lesions encountered at CT depends on the diagnosis, but little evidence supports CT diagnosis of most adnexal lesion types. Purpose To evaluate the interreader agreement and CT diagnosis of incidentally discovered adnexal lesions. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, multi-institutional, multireader retrospective study conducted from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, included patients who had malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (<i>n</i> = 8) and without metastases (<i>n</i> = 8), simple cysts (<i>n</i> = 6), dermoids (<i>n</i> = 9), hydrosalpinx (<i>n</i> = 5), benign cystadenomas and/or cystadenofibromas (<i>n</i> = 10), hemorrhagic cysts (<i>n</i> = 8), endometriomas (<i>n</i> = 6), ovarian fibromas (<i>n</i> = 5), leiomyomas (<i>n</i> = 5), and peritoneal inclusion cysts (<i>n</i> = 5) detected at CT. Nine members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently reviewed the CT images and used the American College of Radiology white paper to determine the most likely diagnosis. A 2 × 2 factorial random-effects model was used to calculate the mean adjusted accuracy and disparity among the readers. Interreader agreement was calculated using a Gwet AC1 test. Results In total, 75 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 16 [SD]) were included. The mean adjusted accuracy and interreader agreement were highest for dermoids (99% and 0.97, respectively), malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (94% and 0.90), and simple cysts (86% and 0.64). The mean adjusted accuracy for all other lesion types was less than 72%, with fair to moderate interreader agreement. Overall, readers more accurately diagnosed malignant lesions (82%) than benign lesions (52%) (<i>P</i> < .001). Readers recorded a benign diagnosis when a malignant lesion was present 28% of the time (20 of 72) (<i>P</i> < .001) when there were no metastases. Conclusion Readers' mean adjusted accuracy was greatest for dermoids, malignant ovarian lesions with metastases, and simple cysts at CT, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement; all other lesions were challenging, and a substantial number of malignant ovarian lesions were misdiagnosed as benign. © RSNA, 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243477
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidental Adnexal Lesions: CT Diagnosis and Interreader Agreement

Shaun A. Wahab, Atul Bhanudas Shinagare, Melina Pectasides, Zhou Lan et al.
Radiology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Incidental Adnexal Lesions: CT Diagnosis and Interreader Agreement

Shaun A. Wahab, Atul Bhanudas Shinagare, Melina Pectasides, Zhou Lan, Xiaoyang Liu, Lauren A. Roller, Ekta Maheshwari, Katherine E. Maturen, Nancy Kim, Yang Guo, Luyao Shen, Elizabeth A. Sadowski, Krupa K. Patel-Lippmann
article en

Abstract

Background The management of incidental adnexal lesions encountered at CT depends on the diagnosis, but little evidence supports CT diagnosis of most adnexal lesion types. Purpose To evaluate the interreader agreement and CT diagnosis of incidentally discovered adnexal lesions. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, multi-institutional, multireader retrospective study conducted from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, included patients who had malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (<i>n</i> = 8) and without metastases (<i>n</i> = 8), simple cysts (<i>n</i> = 6), dermoids (<i>n</i> = 9), hydrosalpinx (<i>n</i> = 5), benign cystadenomas and/or cystadenofibromas (<i>n</i> = 10), hemorrhagic cysts (<i>n</i> = 8), endometriomas (<i>n</i> = 6), ovarian fibromas (<i>n</i> = 5), leiomyomas (<i>n</i> = 5), and peritoneal inclusion cysts (<i>n</i> = 5) detected at CT. Nine members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently reviewed the CT images and used the American College of Radiology white paper to determine the most likely diagnosis. A 2 × 2 factorial random-effects model was used to calculate the mean adjusted accuracy and disparity among the readers. Interreader agreement was calculated using a Gwet AC1 test. Results In total, 75 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 16 [SD]) were included. The mean adjusted accuracy and interreader agreement were highest for dermoids (99% and 0.97, respectively), malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (94% and 0.90), and simple cysts (86% and 0.64). The mean adjusted accuracy for all other lesion types was less than 72%, with fair to moderate interreader agreement. Overall, readers more accurately diagnosed malignant lesions (82%) than benign lesions (52%) (<i>P</i> < .001). Readers recorded a benign diagnosis when a malignant lesion was present 28% of the time (20 of 72) (<i>P</i> < .001) when there were no metastases. Conclusion Readers' mean adjusted accuracy was greatest for dermoids, malignant ovarian lesions with metastases, and simple cysts at CT, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement; all other lesions were challenging, and a substantial number of malignant ovarian lesions were misdiagnosed as benign. © RSNA, 2026.

RadiologyVol. 318(2)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), University Health Network (CA), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), Georgetown University (US), University of Michigan (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US), Michigan Medicine (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (FR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), Stanford University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.