Strengthening Trauma‐Informed Care in Disability Services: Addressing Everyday and Structural Harm

ABSTRACT This paper argues for the development of a disability‐specific trauma‐informed care (TIC) framework to address the unique and layered vulnerabilities of people with disabilities. While TIC has become a leading paradigm in human services and is increasingly recognized in the disability field, it remains inconsistently implemented with limited disability‐specific theoretical development. People with disabilities are not only disproportionately exposed to violence and abuse but also endure subtle, cumulative forms of everyday harm, as well as systemic and historical trauma rooted in ableism and institutionalization. These intersecting experiences are not adequately addressed by current TIC models, which are often hindered by barriers at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels. This paper asserts that a tailored framework is essential to bridge the gap between the ideals of TIC and the reality of service provision, ensuring that care truly fosters healing and avoids re‐traumatization for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.70052
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening Trauma‐Informed Care in Disability Services: Addressing Everyday and Structural Harm

Ayelet Gur
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Strengthening Trauma‐Informed Care in Disability Services: Addressing Everyday and Structural Harm

Ayelet Gur
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper argues for the development of a disability‐specific trauma‐informed care (TIC) framework to address the unique and layered vulnerabilities of people with disabilities. While TIC has become a leading paradigm in human services and is increasingly recognized in the disability field, it remains inconsistently implemented with limited disability‐specific theoretical development. People with disabilities are not only disproportionately exposed to violence and abuse but also endure subtle, cumulative forms of everyday harm, as well as systemic and historical trauma rooted in ableism and institutionalization. These intersecting experiences are not adequately addressed by current TIC models, which are often hindered by barriers at the individual, organizational, and systemic levels. This paper asserts that a tailored framework is essential to bridge the gap between the ideals of TIC and the reality of service provision, ensuring that care truly fosters healing and avoids re‐traumatization for this population.

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 23(1)
Tel Hai Academic College (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.