Board Diversity and Corporate Social Irresponsibility

Our study aims to examine the impact of board diversity on socially irresponsible actions (corporate social irresponsibility [CSI]). Using a sample of Spanish firms listed from 2014 to 2022, our results evidence a negative effect of diversity on CSI. This suggests that diversity in corporate decision-making promotes a more ethical and accountable organisational culture. Our research has significant implications for internal agents, since incorporating board diversity emerges as an effective instrument that can constrain CSI practices. Moreover, diversity is an advantage for directors who are sensitive to threats to their reputational capital. By reducing CSI, directors consolidate their reputation as trusted overseers, which in turn protects their current and potential appointments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G34: M14

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BRQ Business Research Quarterly
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444261416939
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Board Diversity and Corporate Social Irresponsibility

JERÓNIMO PÉREZ ALEMÁN, CAROLINA BONA SÁNCHEZ, Diana Teresa Santana Martín, Gema del C Fleitas Castillo
BRQ Business Research Quarterly
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Board Diversity and Corporate Social Irresponsibility

JERÓNIMO PÉREZ ALEMÁN, CAROLINA BONA SÁNCHEZ, Diana Teresa Santana Martín, Gema del C Fleitas Castillo
article en

Abstract

Our study aims to examine the impact of board diversity on socially irresponsible actions (corporate social irresponsibility [CSI]). Using a sample of Spanish firms listed from 2014 to 2022, our results evidence a negative effect of diversity on CSI. This suggests that diversity in corporate decision-making promotes a more ethical and accountable organisational culture. Our research has significant implications for internal agents, since incorporating board diversity emerges as an effective instrument that can constrain CSI practices. Moreover, diversity is an advantage for directors who are sensitive to threats to their reputational capital. By reducing CSI, directors consolidate their reputation as trusted overseers, which in turn protects their current and potential appointments. JEL CLASSIFICATION G34: M14

BRQ Business Research QuarterlyVol. 29
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.