Cost-Plus-Loss Evaluation of Double Sampling Strategies for Insect Defoliator Mitigation Decisions

Abstract Forest damage may increase in frequency, extent and severity as a consequence of climate change and global trade. To mitigate the negative consequences of forest damage caused by insects and fungi, pest management strategies need to be established. An important component of such strategies is the assessment of pest population densities to predict subsequent potential damage during outbreaks. In this study we evaluated different inventory strategies for assessing the population density of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris ) insect defoliators through cost-plus-loss analysis where the cost of the inventory is added to the expected losses, mainly from incorrect decisions due to inaccurate information. We assessed what inventory strategy minimized the expected cost-plus-loss for differentspatial distribution of pupae populations, forest stand ages and forest areas affected. The results showed that double sampling was a more efficient sampling strategy than a single-phase survey. With the double sampling strategy, a second phase sample was selected if the first phase results were inconclusive regarding whether pest mitigation efforts should be implemented. The average cost-plus-loss varied widely over all simulated defoliator pupae populations and stand ages. For the double sampling strategy, the average cost-plus-loss was between ~ 18.7 thousand SEK and 5.6 million SEK, while the alternative cost-plus-loss ranged between ~ 18.7 thousand SEK and 9.7 million SEK. The results underscored the importance of accurate information for decision-making in defoliator control, and that a double sampling strategy is better than a single sampling scheme for most scenarios evaluated. We found that the least inventory efforts should be used to evaluate defoliator populations in stands close to a scheduled harvest, and more efforts should be allocated to younger standsdue to the higher expected loss from incorrect decisions. In younger stands, salvage logging due to defoliation induced mortality resulted in higher costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Science
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44391-025-00049-1
Primary Topic
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-Plus-Loss Evaluation of Double Sampling Strategies for Insect Defoliator Mitigation Decisions

Åke Lindelöw, Cornelia Roberge, Göran Ståhl, Martin Schroeder et al.
Forest Science
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
article

Cost-Plus-Loss Evaluation of Double Sampling Strategies for Insect Defoliator Mitigation Decisions

Åke Lindelöw, Cornelia Roberge, Göran Ståhl, Martin Schroeder, Anton Grafström, Karin Öhman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Forest damage may increase in frequency, extent and severity as a consequence of climate change and global trade. To mitigate the negative consequences of forest damage caused by insects and fungi, pest management strategies need to be established. An important component of such strategies is the assessment of pest population densities to predict subsequent potential damage during outbreaks. In this study we evaluated different inventory strategies for assessing the population density of Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris ) insect defoliators through cost-plus-loss analysis where the cost of the inventory is added to the expected losses, mainly from incorrect decisions due to inaccurate information. We assessed what inventory strategy minimized the expected cost-plus-loss for differentspatial distribution of pupae populations, forest stand ages and forest areas affected. The results showed that double sampling was a more efficient sampling strategy than a single-phase survey. With the double sampling strategy, a second phase sample was selected if the first phase results were inconclusive regarding whether pest mitigation efforts should be implemented. The average cost-plus-loss varied widely over all simulated defoliator pupae populations and stand ages. For the double sampling strategy, the average cost-plus-loss was between ~ 18.7 thousand SEK and 5.6 million SEK, while the alternative cost-plus-loss ranged between ~ 18.7 thousand SEK and 9.7 million SEK. The results underscored the importance of accurate information for decision-making in defoliator control, and that a double sampling strategy is better than a single sampling scheme for most scenarios evaluated. We found that the least inventory efforts should be used to evaluate defoliator populations in stands close to a scheduled harvest, and more efforts should be allocated to younger standsdue to the higher expected loss from incorrect decisions. In younger stands, salvage logging due to defoliation induced mortality resulted in higher costs.

Forest ScienceVol. 72(1)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Forest Insect Ecology and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.