Regional Differences in Intergroup Trust Between Northern and Southern China

Humans display ingroup favouritism when trusting others, showing greater trust toward ingroup members than outgroup members. This research examined regional differences in intergroup trust between southern and northern China. In Study 1, we analysed data from a national survey (N = 10,968) to compare attitudes toward trust in various relationships among respondents from the North and South. In Study 2, we used game experiments (N = 156) to measure behavioural trust among northern and southern college students toward different groups, and to explore micro-level explanatory factors for regional differences. Study 3 (N = 65) further tested the mechanisms underlying these regional differences through experimental manipulations based on the results of Study 2. The findings indicated that both southerners and northerners exhibit ingroup favouritism under relational cues, while only northerners show ingroup favouritism under categorical cues. Expectations of reciprocity can explain the regional differences in intergroup trust between South China and North China. This research provides new insights and evidence on the cultural differences in intergroup trust, thereby enhancing the understanding of regional culture and its psychological manifestations in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70185
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Differences in Intergroup Trust Between Northern and Southern China

Chen Yong-lu, Yiyao ZHANG, Liying Bai, Haotian Xiao et al.
International Journal of Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Regional Differences in Intergroup Trust Between Northern and Southern China

Chen Yong-lu, Yiyao ZHANG, Liying Bai, Haotian Xiao, Yixuan Wang
article en

Abstract

Humans display ingroup favouritism when trusting others, showing greater trust toward ingroup members than outgroup members. This research examined regional differences in intergroup trust between southern and northern China. In Study 1, we analysed data from a national survey (N = 10,968) to compare attitudes toward trust in various relationships among respondents from the North and South. In Study 2, we used game experiments (N = 156) to measure behavioural trust among northern and southern college students toward different groups, and to explore micro-level explanatory factors for regional differences. Study 3 (N = 65) further tested the mechanisms underlying these regional differences through experimental manipulations based on the results of Study 2. The findings indicated that both southerners and northerners exhibit ingroup favouritism under relational cues, while only northerners show ingroup favouritism under categorical cues. Expectations of reciprocity can explain the regional differences in intergroup trust between South China and North China. This research provides new insights and evidence on the cultural differences in intergroup trust, thereby enhancing the understanding of regional culture and its psychological manifestations in China.

International Journal of PsychologyVol. 61(2)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Quanzhou Normal University (CN), Xi'an University of Finance and Economics (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.