Physicians Are Not Providers: The Ethical Significance of Names in Health Care: A Policy Paper From the American College of Physicians

More than 25 years ago, Pellegrino and Relman noted the increasing commercialization of the learned professions, anticipating what many physicians are increasingly experiencing today: an impairment of their ability to practice in accordance with standards of medical ethics and professionalism. These hurdles to the physician's ability to do right by the patient contribute to what leaders in medicine and the American College of Physicians have called deprofessionalization. An example is the use of the term <i>provider</i> to describe physicians and other health professionals. The use of this terminology has been reviewed in medical journal articles but has not been adequately explored as a matter of ethics and professionalism. Through that lens, this paper examines the trends, significance, and implications for patients, physicians, and health care of the use of the term <i>provider</i>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2026-02-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-03852
Primary Topic
Medical Research and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physicians Are Not Providers: The Ethical Significance of Names in Health Care: A Policy Paper From the American College of Physicians

Alicia I. Arbaje, Alejandro Moreno, Kyle E. Karches, Erin S. DeMartino et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine
Medical Research and Practices
article

Physicians Are Not Providers: The Ethical Significance of Names in Health Care: A Policy Paper From the American College of Physicians

Alicia I. Arbaje, Alejandro Moreno, Kyle E. Karches, Erin S. DeMartino, Laurie Lyckholm, Lois Snyder Sulmasy, Amy McKenzie, Jan K. Carney, Tatjana Calvano, Noel N. Deep, Luis Isea Mercado, Eduardo Bruera, Micah W. Beachy, Ikaasa Suri
article en

Abstract

More than 25 years ago, Pellegrino and Relman noted the increasing commercialization of the learned professions, anticipating what many physicians are increasingly experiencing today: an impairment of their ability to practice in accordance with standards of medical ethics and professionalism. These hurdles to the physician's ability to do right by the patient contribute to what leaders in medicine and the American College of Physicians have called deprofessionalization. An example is the use of the term <i>provider</i> to describe physicians and other health professionals. The use of this terminology has been reviewed in medical journal articles but has not been adequately explored as a matter of ethics and professionalism. Through that lens, this paper examines the trends, significance, and implications for patients, physicians, and health care of the use of the term <i>provider</i>.

Annals of Internal Medicine
University of Vermont (US), American College of Physicians (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Medical Research and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Physicians Are Not Providers: The Ethical Significance of Names in Health Care: A Policy Paper From the American College of Physicians — Alicia I. Arbaje, Alejandro Moreno, et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS