Paving the Way for SysML v2: An ESA MBSE Methodology Implementation Review

ABSTRACT Heading toward DE and the goal to provide a common, freely accessible MBSE methodology for its member states, ESA has developed the ESA MBSE Methodology. Initially based on SysML v1, it has been applied in numerous space and non‐space projects. With the anticipated release of SysML v2, introducing substantial updates to the language and its application in SE, there is growing interest in assessing its impact. This paper investigates the potential benefits and challenges associated to this transition through a pilot SysML v2 implementation of the ESA MBSE Methodology. A structured approach was followed: identifying the major changes introduced by SysML v2 within the scope of the available tools, then employing an iterative process to map ESA MBSE Methodology concepts to SysML v2 elements. A SysML v2 language extension in textual notation was developed, and applied to a case study space mission. A comparison of the graphical notation diagrams generated in SysML v1 and v2 was also performed, leading into key insights of differences between the SysML v1 and v2 implementations. Notable differences are observed in the way definitions and usages can be exploited by the methodology, as well as how Functions can be implemented and used. This work provides a basis for further methodology refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems Engineering
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.70046
Primary Topic
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paving the Way for SysML v2: An ESA MBSE Methodology Implementation Review

Nikolena Christofi, Alberto Gonzalez Fernandez, Marcel Verhoef, Nils Fischer et al.
Systems Engineering
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
article

Paving the Way for SysML v2: An ESA MBSE Methodology Implementation Review

Nikolena Christofi, Alberto Gonzalez Fernandez, Marcel Verhoef, Nils Fischer, Matteo Duroy
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Heading toward DE and the goal to provide a common, freely accessible MBSE methodology for its member states, ESA has developed the ESA MBSE Methodology. Initially based on SysML v1, it has been applied in numerous space and non‐space projects. With the anticipated release of SysML v2, introducing substantial updates to the language and its application in SE, there is growing interest in assessing its impact. This paper investigates the potential benefits and challenges associated to this transition through a pilot SysML v2 implementation of the ESA MBSE Methodology. A structured approach was followed: identifying the major changes introduced by SysML v2 within the scope of the available tools, then employing an iterative process to map ESA MBSE Methodology concepts to SysML v2 elements. A SysML v2 language extension in textual notation was developed, and applied to a case study space mission. A comparison of the graphical notation diagrams generated in SysML v1 and v2 was also performed, leading into key insights of differences between the SysML v1 and v2 implementations. Notable differences are observed in the way definitions and usages can be exploited by the methodology, as well as how Functions can be implemented and used. This work provides a basis for further methodology refinement.

Systems Engineering
European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.