Do geopolitical tensions increase negative attitudes toward minorities? Evidence from a natural experiment in India

On April 22, 2025, militants carried out an attack near the village of Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir. Over the next couple of weeks, tensions between India and Pakistan escalated, culminating in a 4-day war between the nuclear powers. Using a survey experiment conducted in Uttar Pradesh, we explore how changes in geopolitical tensions influenced the attitudes of Indian Hindus toward Indian Muslims and other minorities. We find that the conflict between India and Pakistan caused Hindu attitudes toward religious minorities to significantly deteriorate. Negative attitudes toward Muslims, Christians, and Sikhs peaked after India announced nationwide preparations for a “hostile attack” but eased somewhat when India engaged in direct conflict with Pakistan. Attitudes nearly returned to baseline levels in the days following the ceasefire. Regarding theoretical mechanisms, the evidence suggests that despite any positive impacts of patriotic unity, the negative impacts of psychological distress and group threat had dominated. Taken together, the findings underscore the vulnerability of minorities during times of national crisis. • In theory, the link between geopolitics and social cohesion is ambiguous. • This study uses the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict as a natural experiment. • We happened to be engaged in data collection during the conflict. • The conflict caused Hindu attitudes toward religious minorities to deteriorate. • The findings underscore the vulnerability of minorities during national crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Research
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2026.103323
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do geopolitical tensions increase negative attitudes toward minorities? Evidence from a natural experiment in India

Nikhitha Mary Mathew, Andrew Francis-Tan, Chitra Pratap
Social Science Research
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Do geopolitical tensions increase negative attitudes toward minorities? Evidence from a natural experiment in India

Nikhitha Mary Mathew, Andrew Francis-Tan, Chitra Pratap
article en

Abstract

On April 22, 2025, militants carried out an attack near the village of Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir. Over the next couple of weeks, tensions between India and Pakistan escalated, culminating in a 4-day war between the nuclear powers. Using a survey experiment conducted in Uttar Pradesh, we explore how changes in geopolitical tensions influenced the attitudes of Indian Hindus toward Indian Muslims and other minorities. We find that the conflict between India and Pakistan caused Hindu attitudes toward religious minorities to significantly deteriorate. Negative attitudes toward Muslims, Christians, and Sikhs peaked after India announced nationwide preparations for a “hostile attack” but eased somewhat when India engaged in direct conflict with Pakistan. Attitudes nearly returned to baseline levels in the days following the ceasefire. Regarding theoretical mechanisms, the evidence suggests that despite any positive impacts of patriotic unity, the negative impacts of psychological distress and group threat had dominated. Taken together, the findings underscore the vulnerability of minorities during times of national crisis. • In theory, the link between geopolitics and social cohesion is ambiguous. • This study uses the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict as a natural experiment. • We happened to be engaged in data collection during the conflict. • The conflict caused Hindu attitudes toward religious minorities to deteriorate. • The findings underscore the vulnerability of minorities during national crises.

Social Science ResearchVol. 135
National University of Singapore (SG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.