The advantages of our proposed Saturn coefficient over continuity and trustworthiness for UMAP dimensionality reduction evaluation

Understanding the structure of a dataset is an easy task when the dimensions are two or three, but it can become extremely difficult when a dataset consists of tens, hundreds, or thousands of variables. Dimensionality reduction methods are computational techniques with solid mathematical foundations that allow for the projection of high-dimensional datasets into smaller data spaces. These low-dimensional representations of the original data, usually consisting of two variables, can then be plotted and inspected by researchers to gain an understanding of the original data structure. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) is one of the most effective and popular algorithms for dimensionality reduction, and has been proven effective on biomedical datasets, in particular. Even though UMAP is commonly utilized by thousands of researchers worldwide, no consensus has been reached on how to assess the output of dimensionality reduction informatively: to date, researchers often evaluate UMAP’s outcomes by eyeballing its two-dimensional plots each time. Of course, this approach is rather arbitrary, as different individuals might interpret a 2D plot in a different way. Some numerical coefficients for assessing UMAP’s conservation of global and local structure exist (continuity and trustworthiness, respectively), but they suffer from several flaws and can be misleading in multiple cases. To address these issues, we present here our Saturn coefficient, a new simple statistical metric that expresses the conservation of local structure and the conservation of global structure in UMAP through a real value ranging from 0 (no preservation) to 1 (complete preservation). In this study, we describe the rationale behind our Saturn coefficient and validate its results compared to continuity and trustworthiness on four artificial datasets and ten real-world biomedical datasets. Additionally, we propose a novel validation procedure based on the preservation of the clusters found by HDBSCAN (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) in the original dataset within its dimensionality reduction representation (HDBSCANess). Our results demonstrate the validity of our Saturn coefficient across all artificial datasets and in seven out of fifteen real-world biomedical datasets. We therefore recommend the use of our Saturn coefficient to anyone wishing to assess UMAP results: our statistic, for example, can be used to test several sets of UMAP hyperparameters and to select the best configuration among them. Moreover, we also provide the software implementation of our Saturn coefficient as a standalone R package openly available on CRAN at https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.SaturnCoefficient . SaturnCoefficient and as a standalone Python package openly available on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/SaturnScore .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3424
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The advantages of our proposed Saturn coefficient over continuity and trustworthiness for UMAP dimensionality reduction evaluation

Simone Melzi, Francesca Gasparini, Davide Chicco, Giuseppe Jurman
PeerJ Computer Science
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

The advantages of our proposed Saturn coefficient over continuity and trustworthiness for UMAP dimensionality reduction evaluation

Simone Melzi, Francesca Gasparini, Davide Chicco, Giuseppe Jurman
article en

Abstract

Understanding the structure of a dataset is an easy task when the dimensions are two or three, but it can become extremely difficult when a dataset consists of tens, hundreds, or thousands of variables. Dimensionality reduction methods are computational techniques with solid mathematical foundations that allow for the projection of high-dimensional datasets into smaller data spaces. These low-dimensional representations of the original data, usually consisting of two variables, can then be plotted and inspected by researchers to gain an understanding of the original data structure. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) is one of the most effective and popular algorithms for dimensionality reduction, and has been proven effective on biomedical datasets, in particular. Even though UMAP is commonly utilized by thousands of researchers worldwide, no consensus has been reached on how to assess the output of dimensionality reduction informatively: to date, researchers often evaluate UMAP’s outcomes by eyeballing its two-dimensional plots each time. Of course, this approach is rather arbitrary, as different individuals might interpret a 2D plot in a different way. Some numerical coefficients for assessing UMAP’s conservation of global and local structure exist (continuity and trustworthiness, respectively), but they suffer from several flaws and can be misleading in multiple cases. To address these issues, we present here our Saturn coefficient, a new simple statistical metric that expresses the conservation of local structure and the conservation of global structure in UMAP through a real value ranging from 0 (no preservation) to 1 (complete preservation). In this study, we describe the rationale behind our Saturn coefficient and validate its results compared to continuity and trustworthiness on four artificial datasets and ten real-world biomedical datasets. Additionally, we propose a novel validation procedure based on the preservation of the clusters found by HDBSCAN (hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise) in the original dataset within its dimensionality reduction representation (HDBSCANess). Our results demonstrate the validity of our Saturn coefficient across all artificial datasets and in seven out of fifteen real-world biomedical datasets. We therefore recommend the use of our Saturn coefficient to anyone wishing to assess UMAP results: our statistic, for example, can be used to test several sets of UMAP hyperparameters and to select the best configuration among them. Moreover, we also provide the software implementation of our Saturn coefficient as a standalone R package openly available on CRAN at https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.SaturnCoefficient . SaturnCoefficient and as a standalone Python package openly available on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/SaturnScore .

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 12
Humanitas University (IT), University of Toronto (CA), Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano Bicocca (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.