Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews

Refugee, immigrant, and migrant (RIM) populations experienced unique obstacles to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Already facing displacement, insecure legal status, and economic instability, RIM populations were further affected by service disruptions, discrimination, and systemic weaknesses. The objective of this overview of reviews was to synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for RIM populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024552590). Systematic searches of Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2020 onward) identified systematic reviews addressing healthcare access for RIM during COVID-19. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2. Narrative synthesis was used to categorize barriers and facilitators into cross-cutting domains following a socio-ecological model framework. Nine systematic reviews (published 2021–2024) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 14–256 primary studies each, and spanning low-, middle-, and high-income settings across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Nine interacting domains of barriers and facilitators emerged involving legal constraints, economic concerns, service provision, physical and digital access, trust and confidence, information and communication, cultural and social influences, psychological and perceptual factors, and structural/systemic weaknesses. Common barriers included fear of deportation, exclusion from national health or social protection systems, job and income loss, high direct and indirect costs, service closures, overcrowded housing, discrimination, and misinformation. Facilitators included suspension of exclusionary policies, telemedicine and digital tools, mobile clinics, multilingual and culturally appropriate communication, messaging from trusted clinicians and community leaders, and civil society engagement. This overview shows that the pandemic both intensified long-standing barriers and prompted innovative solutions for RIM healthcare access. Lessons from the pandemic can help guide future sustainable, inclusive health systems for displaced populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14138-5
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews

Thomas Mayers, Fredah Guantai, Huijun Z. Ring, Yuri Terunuma et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for refugee, immigrant, and migrant populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews

Thomas Mayers, Fredah Guantai, Huijun Z. Ring, Yuri Terunuma, Junichi Akashi, R. Inokuchi
article en

Abstract

Refugee, immigrant, and migrant (RIM) populations experienced unique obstacles to healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Already facing displacement, insecure legal status, and economic instability, RIM populations were further affected by service disruptions, discrimination, and systemic weaknesses. The objective of this overview of reviews was to synthesize evidence on barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for RIM populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024552590). Systematic searches of Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (January 2020 onward) identified systematic reviews addressing healthcare access for RIM during COVID-19. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2. Narrative synthesis was used to categorize barriers and facilitators into cross-cutting domains following a socio-ecological model framework. Nine systematic reviews (published 2021–2024) met inclusion criteria, encompassing 14–256 primary studies each, and spanning low-, middle-, and high-income settings across the Americas, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Nine interacting domains of barriers and facilitators emerged involving legal constraints, economic concerns, service provision, physical and digital access, trust and confidence, information and communication, cultural and social influences, psychological and perceptual factors, and structural/systemic weaknesses. Common barriers included fear of deportation, exclusion from national health or social protection systems, job and income loss, high direct and indirect costs, service closures, overcrowded housing, discrimination, and misinformation. Facilitators included suspension of exclusionary policies, telemedicine and digital tools, mobile clinics, multilingual and culturally appropriate communication, messaging from trusted clinicians and community leaders, and civil society engagement. This overview shows that the pandemic both intensified long-standing barriers and prompted innovative solutions for RIM healthcare access. Lessons from the pandemic can help guide future sustainable, inclusive health systems for displaced populations.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 26(1)
University of Tsukuba (JP), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.