Clinicians’ views and attitudes towards perioperative or surgical risk prediction calculators: A systematic thematic synthesis

Background Surgical-and-Perioperative Risk Prediction Calculators (SPRPCs) help predict patients’ safety outcomes for proposed surgical procedures. These evidence-based assessments can inform shared decision-making between patients and providers – improving patient safety, satisfaction and care. However, evidence persistently indicates low use of SPRPCs in surgical care. We reviewed qualitative literature to explore surgeons’ and anaesthetists’ attitudes and perceptions of features of SPRPCs, facilitators, barriers and complexity influencing their adoption. Method A systematic literature search was performed across three bibliographic databases. A two-stage screening process was performed using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Joanna Biggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to critically assess quality. Qualitative data from included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. Results Four qualitative and two mixed-methods paper were included, reporting data from 72 clinicians in total. Three studies focused on orthopaedic surgery SPRPCs, two on the Surgical Perioperative Assessment System tool and one on post-anaesthetic care unit hypotension prediction. Six facilitator, and four barrier, themes were identified. SPRPCs were seen as valuable in lowering patients’ risk of harm and supporting: informed consent discussions, declining surgery, and staff communication. These benefits were contingent on SPRPCs being transparent, accurate and integrated with care pathways. Conversely, some argued SPRPCs do not change clinical decisions, pose a threat to autonomy and patient-centred care and open the clinician to legal liability. Conclusions SPRPCs are underutilised when developed without consideration of clinicians’ needs and workflow. Findings highlight the importance of clinicians’ involvement in SPRPC design. Further research would support improvements in their clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435261421362
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians’ views and attitudes towards perioperative or surgical risk prediction calculators: A systematic thematic synthesis

Aamir Ali, Natalie Edelman, Elizabeth Ford, Sana Akal Jaan
Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Clinicians’ views and attitudes towards perioperative or surgical risk prediction calculators: A systematic thematic synthesis

Aamir Ali, Natalie Edelman, Elizabeth Ford, Sana Akal Jaan
article en

Abstract

Background Surgical-and-Perioperative Risk Prediction Calculators (SPRPCs) help predict patients’ safety outcomes for proposed surgical procedures. These evidence-based assessments can inform shared decision-making between patients and providers – improving patient safety, satisfaction and care. However, evidence persistently indicates low use of SPRPCs in surgical care. We reviewed qualitative literature to explore surgeons’ and anaesthetists’ attitudes and perceptions of features of SPRPCs, facilitators, barriers and complexity influencing their adoption. Method A systematic literature search was performed across three bibliographic databases. A two-stage screening process was performed using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Joanna Biggs Institute (JBI) checklist was used to critically assess quality. Qualitative data from included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. Results Four qualitative and two mixed-methods paper were included, reporting data from 72 clinicians in total. Three studies focused on orthopaedic surgery SPRPCs, two on the Surgical Perioperative Assessment System tool and one on post-anaesthetic care unit hypotension prediction. Six facilitator, and four barrier, themes were identified. SPRPCs were seen as valuable in lowering patients’ risk of harm and supporting: informed consent discussions, declining surgery, and staff communication. These benefits were contingent on SPRPCs being transparent, accurate and integrated with care pathways. Conversely, some argued SPRPCs do not change clinical decisions, pose a threat to autonomy and patient-centred care and open the clinician to legal liability. Conclusions SPRPCs are underutilised when developed without consideration of clinicians’ needs and workflow. Findings highlight the importance of clinicians’ involvement in SPRPC design. Further research would support improvements in their clinical adoption.

Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University of Kent (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.