Hybrid alienation: reproductive labour and emancipation in the anthropocene

Abstract This article develops an account of alienation that centres the way in which reproductive labour determines the constitution and shape of this world. The first part proposes a functionalist reading of the idea of the regeneration and reproduction of a liveable world as joint human and non-human labour. It draws on the Wages for Housework movement to argue that understanding reproduction as labour illuminates the ways in which the ‘naturalness’ of reproduction emerges as a function of a deeper political decision to valorise production. The second part provides a hybrid reconstruction of alienation as a means to critique such an arrangement of labour, without inadvertently falling back on a reified notion of ‘nature’. I argue that this helps us keep track of the political construction of ‘nature’ which underlies the concepts of political theory we rely on. The third part ties both of these strands together: a political organisation of labour that relies on the ‘naturalisation’ of reproduction alienates us by rendering it impossible to make our own fundamental decisions about the constitution of the collective. Thereby, it offers a way of holding onto the goal of emancipation in the Anthropocene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Political Theory
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-026-00793-0
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid alienation: reproductive labour and emancipation in the anthropocene

Carl Pierer
Contemporary Political Theory
Political Economy and Marxism
article

Hybrid alienation: reproductive labour and emancipation in the anthropocene

Carl Pierer
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article develops an account of alienation that centres the way in which reproductive labour determines the constitution and shape of this world. The first part proposes a functionalist reading of the idea of the regeneration and reproduction of a liveable world as joint human and non-human labour. It draws on the Wages for Housework movement to argue that understanding reproduction as labour illuminates the ways in which the ‘naturalness’ of reproduction emerges as a function of a deeper political decision to valorise production. The second part provides a hybrid reconstruction of alienation as a means to critique such an arrangement of labour, without inadvertently falling back on a reified notion of ‘nature’. I argue that this helps us keep track of the political construction of ‘nature’ which underlies the concepts of political theory we rely on. The third part ties both of these strands together: a political organisation of labour that relies on the ‘naturalisation’ of reproduction alienates us by rendering it impossible to make our own fundamental decisions about the constitution of the collective. Thereby, it offers a way of holding onto the goal of emancipation in the Anthropocene.

Contemporary Political TheoryVol. 25(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS)
Cambridge Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.