A systematic review of feedback literacy scales: Development and validation

The effectiveness of feedback practices in educational settings depends critically on the feedback literacy of both students and teachers. Accurately assessing feedback literacy levels is essential for facilitating teachers and students to plan for a better feedback experience. This systematic review synthesised 17 scales measuring feedback literacy through analysing their structure and psychometric properties. Our analysis revealed a predominant focus on student feedback literacy scales in a general higher education context. Furthermore, existing scales primarily assessed capacities and dispositions, often overlooking the knowledge component. Current teacher feedback literacy scales do not fully include the key elements that teachers need to help students improve their feedback literacy. While evaluations of these scales generally indicated acceptable to good psychometric reliability and validity, opportunities for methodological improvement exist, such as using multiple reliability assessment methods and conducting Rasch analysis. To improve measurement accuracy, direct tests or more behavioural indicators should be considered in scale design. • Existing SFL scales often overlook the knowledge component. • Current TFL scales lack key elements needed to support SFL. • Multiple psychometric measures can improve scale reliability and validity. • Five design implications are proposed to better measure feedback literacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies In Educational Evaluation
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101578
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of feedback literacy scales: Development and validation

Zhi Hong Wan, Ying Zhan, Wenyun LUO, Zi Yan et al.
Studies In Educational Evaluation
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

A systematic review of feedback literacy scales: Development and validation

Zhi Hong Wan, Ying Zhan, Wenyun LUO, Zi Yan, Ye Zeng
article en

Abstract

The effectiveness of feedback practices in educational settings depends critically on the feedback literacy of both students and teachers. Accurately assessing feedback literacy levels is essential for facilitating teachers and students to plan for a better feedback experience. This systematic review synthesised 17 scales measuring feedback literacy through analysing their structure and psychometric properties. Our analysis revealed a predominant focus on student feedback literacy scales in a general higher education context. Furthermore, existing scales primarily assessed capacities and dispositions, often overlooking the knowledge component. Current teacher feedback literacy scales do not fully include the key elements that teachers need to help students improve their feedback literacy. While evaluations of these scales generally indicated acceptable to good psychometric reliability and validity, opportunities for methodological improvement exist, such as using multiple reliability assessment methods and conducting Rasch analysis. To improve measurement accuracy, direct tests or more behavioural indicators should be considered in scale design. • Existing SFL scales often overlook the knowledge component. • Current TFL scales lack key elements needed to support SFL. • Multiple psychometric measures can improve scale reliability and validity. • Five design implications are proposed to better measure feedback literacy.

Studies In Educational EvaluationVol. 88
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.