Goldman Sachs and the politics of sustainability: a critical dilemma

Research methodology Secondary study from digital sources. Case overview/synopsis By December 1, 2024, opposition to environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies in the USA had intensified, with 165 anti-ESG bills introduced across 37 states and 22 passed in diluted forms. This backlash created reputational, financial and political risks for firms committed to sustainability. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon and his leadership team faced a pivotal decision: whether to remain in the Net-Zero Banking Alliance. Acknowledging the complexity, they aimed to adopt a data-driven approach and design a structured decision-making checklist to evaluate potential impacts on profitability, stakeholder alignment, regulatory exposure and long-term environmental commitments. Through this case discussion, students will engage in a critical evaluation of the trade-offs between sustainability objectives and business priorities. By simulating decision-making as a CEO or as a member of the leadership team, they will be challenged to develop actionable strategies that address complex sustainability dilemmas. This approach promotes the development of essential leadership qualities, including critical thinking, ethical decision-making and the ability to navigate modern sustainability challenges. The discussion is designed to deliver transformative learning outcomes, equipping students with the skills and insights necessary for leading responsibly in an increasingly sustainability-driven business landscape. Complexity academic level This case is well-suited for courses in Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility, Strategic Management and Business Ethics and Governance. It can also be adapted for electives on Corporate Reputation Management, Responsible Leadership and International Business Policy. The case is relevant to programs in Business Administration, Management and Public Policy and may also be used in interdisciplinary courses that explore the intersection of finance, sustainability and regulatory environments. Its emphasis on decision-making under political and reputational uncertainty makes it valuable for both undergraduate (final-year) and postgraduate (MBA or equivalent) students preparing for leadership roles in complex, global business environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The CASE Journal
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-07-2025-0235
Primary Topic
Sustainability in Higher Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goldman Sachs and the politics of sustainability: a critical dilemma

Ujjal Mukherjee
The CASE Journal
Sustainability in Higher Education
article

Goldman Sachs and the politics of sustainability: a critical dilemma

Ujjal Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

Research methodology Secondary study from digital sources. Case overview/synopsis By December 1, 2024, opposition to environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies in the USA had intensified, with 165 anti-ESG bills introduced across 37 states and 22 passed in diluted forms. This backlash created reputational, financial and political risks for firms committed to sustainability. Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon and his leadership team faced a pivotal decision: whether to remain in the Net-Zero Banking Alliance. Acknowledging the complexity, they aimed to adopt a data-driven approach and design a structured decision-making checklist to evaluate potential impacts on profitability, stakeholder alignment, regulatory exposure and long-term environmental commitments. Through this case discussion, students will engage in a critical evaluation of the trade-offs between sustainability objectives and business priorities. By simulating decision-making as a CEO or as a member of the leadership team, they will be challenged to develop actionable strategies that address complex sustainability dilemmas. This approach promotes the development of essential leadership qualities, including critical thinking, ethical decision-making and the ability to navigate modern sustainability challenges. The discussion is designed to deliver transformative learning outcomes, equipping students with the skills and insights necessary for leading responsibly in an increasingly sustainability-driven business landscape. Complexity academic level This case is well-suited for courses in Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility, Strategic Management and Business Ethics and Governance. It can also be adapted for electives on Corporate Reputation Management, Responsible Leadership and International Business Policy. The case is relevant to programs in Business Administration, Management and Public Policy and may also be used in interdisciplinary courses that explore the intersection of finance, sustainability and regulatory environments. Its emphasis on decision-making under political and reputational uncertainty makes it valuable for both undergraduate (final-year) and postgraduate (MBA or equivalent) students preparing for leadership roles in complex, global business environments.

The CASE Journal
Institute of Public Enterprise (IN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sustainability in Higher Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.