Differential responses of prokaryotic and fungal communities in soil microenvironments to drying and wetting as affected by soil aggregate isolation method

• Microbial communities are altered by aggregate separation method. • Wet sieving increased microbial diversity in comparison to dry sieving. • Soil prokaryotic and fungal communities responded differently to dry and wet sieving. • Ribosomal RNA copy number and genome size showed high abundances in drier soils. Microorganisms live in communities within and on the surface of soil aggregates of varying sizes. A growing body of evidence suggests that different size fractions of aggregates are habitats for distinct microbial communities, but comparisons have been difficult owing to different aggregate separation methods. Two aggregate isolation methods, dry and wet sieving, originating from field moist and dried soils were used to investigate their effects on the prokaryotic and fungal communities in four aggregate size fractions (large macroaggregates (>2000 μm), small macroaggregates (250–2000 μm), microaggregates (53–250 μm), and silt & clay (<53 μm)) using metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer. While prokaryotic community composition among treatments in each of the four size fractions was different, the composition and alpha diversity for fungi were more resistant to change in large and small macroaggregates than in the microaggregate and silt & clay fractions. The average prokaryotic ribosomal RNA copy number and genome size increased in all aggregate size fractions when soils were dried before sieving. Decisions on which aggregate separation method to use depend heavily on the questions one is interested in, but soil storage conditions between sample collection and sieving are highlighted as driving the biggest differences in microbial community composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117723
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential responses of prokaryotic and fungal communities in soil microenvironments to drying and wetting as affected by soil aggregate isolation method

Cameron McMillan, Kate M. Scow, Jonathan Y. Lin, Daoyuan Wang et al.
Geoderma
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
article

Differential responses of prokaryotic and fungal communities in soil microenvironments to drying and wetting as affected by soil aggregate isolation method

Cameron McMillan, Kate M. Scow, Jonathan Y. Lin, Daoyuan Wang, Jorge L. Mazza Rodrigues, King C. Law
article en

Abstract

• Microbial communities are altered by aggregate separation method. • Wet sieving increased microbial diversity in comparison to dry sieving. • Soil prokaryotic and fungal communities responded differently to dry and wet sieving. • Ribosomal RNA copy number and genome size showed high abundances in drier soils. Microorganisms live in communities within and on the surface of soil aggregates of varying sizes. A growing body of evidence suggests that different size fractions of aggregates are habitats for distinct microbial communities, but comparisons have been difficult owing to different aggregate separation methods. Two aggregate isolation methods, dry and wet sieving, originating from field moist and dried soils were used to investigate their effects on the prokaryotic and fungal communities in four aggregate size fractions (large macroaggregates (>2000 μm), small macroaggregates (250–2000 μm), microaggregates (53–250 μm), and silt & clay (<53 μm)) using metabarcoding of the 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer. While prokaryotic community composition among treatments in each of the four size fractions was different, the composition and alpha diversity for fungi were more resistant to change in large and small macroaggregates than in the microaggregate and silt & clay fractions. The average prokaryotic ribosomal RNA copy number and genome size increased in all aggregate size fractions when soils were dried before sieving. Decisions on which aggregate separation method to use depend heavily on the questions one is interested in, but soil storage conditions between sample collection and sieving are highlighted as driving the biggest differences in microbial community composition.

GeodermaVol. 467
Shanghai University (CN), Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.