Beyond Clusters: Rethinking Innovation Sustainability in Quito’s ICT Sector

Traditional innovation studies frequently highlight the role of geographic clustering in fostering competitive advantages. However, the sustainability of innovation cannot be understood solely through spatial proximity and requires a broader, multidisciplinary perspective. This study examines the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector in Quito by applying the CRI (Capabilities, Results, and Impacts) model of innovation potential, adapted to the local organisational and institutional context. By combining normalised CRI data with georeferenced firm information, spatial autocorrelation was assessed using Moran’s Index and local indicators of spatial association (LISA). The results reveal random spatial patterns and no statistically significant evidence of innovation clustering among firms, academia, and the public sector. Notably, the few high-concentration clusters identified lie outside the traditional economic and institutional hubs of the Quito Innovation System. These findings demonstrate that innovation capacities, outputs, and impacts in Quito’s ICT sector are driven more by organisational capabilities, institutional linkages, and sectoral dynamics than by geographic location. This study contributes to the debate on sustainable innovation systems by challenging the assumption of spatial dependence and emphasising the need for policies and managerial practices that strengthen resilient innovation networks beyond clusters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041796
Primary Topic
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Clusters: Rethinking Innovation Sustainability in Quito’s ICT Sector

Zanna Aniscenko, Adrian Benavides-Suarez, Andrés Robalino-López
Sustainability
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
article

Beyond Clusters: Rethinking Innovation Sustainability in Quito’s ICT Sector

Zanna Aniscenko, Adrian Benavides-Suarez, Andrés Robalino-López
article en

Abstract

Traditional innovation studies frequently highlight the role of geographic clustering in fostering competitive advantages. However, the sustainability of innovation cannot be understood solely through spatial proximity and requires a broader, multidisciplinary perspective. This study examines the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector in Quito by applying the CRI (Capabilities, Results, and Impacts) model of innovation potential, adapted to the local organisational and institutional context. By combining normalised CRI data with georeferenced firm information, spatial autocorrelation was assessed using Moran’s Index and local indicators of spatial association (LISA). The results reveal random spatial patterns and no statistically significant evidence of innovation clustering among firms, academia, and the public sector. Notably, the few high-concentration clusters identified lie outside the traditional economic and institutional hubs of the Quito Innovation System. These findings demonstrate that innovation capacities, outputs, and impacts in Quito’s ICT sector are driven more by organisational capabilities, institutional linkages, and sectoral dynamics than by geographic location. This study contributes to the debate on sustainable innovation systems by challenging the assumption of spatial dependence and emphasising the need for policies and managerial practices that strengthen resilient innovation networks beyond clusters.

SustainabilityVol. 18(4)
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (EC), National Polytechnic School (EC), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (EC)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.