How Electrochemical Measurements in the Brain Have Shaped Our Understanding of Depression

Mental health disorders, such as depression, represent a growing global challenge. Depression is difficult to diagnose and treat. These difficulties stem from an insufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disorder. It is incredibly challenging to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches without a clear understanding of depression pathology. Neurotransmitters are low in concentration and fluctuate rapidly, making them difficult to investigate. Progress in methods to study the brain has uncovered clues to the pathology of depression and antidepressant mechanisms. In this review, we first describe the three medical hypotheses of depression: the monoamine, plasticity, and inflammation theories. We highlight key analytical methods that have been employed in depression studies. Lastly, we show how these investigations have advanced our knowledge of depression mechanisms and treatment strategies. Thus, via this review, we present the status quo of how chemical measurements are guiding our understanding of the chemical underpinnings of depression and pointing the community toward new antidepressant treatment targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-052225-082205
Primary Topic
Tryptophan and brain disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Electrochemical Measurements in the Brain Have Shaped Our Understanding of Depression

Parastoo Hashemi, P. Prieto, B. Baumberger, L. Batey
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
Tryptophan and brain disorders
article

How Electrochemical Measurements in the Brain Have Shaped Our Understanding of Depression

Parastoo Hashemi, P. Prieto, B. Baumberger, L. Batey
article en

Abstract

Mental health disorders, such as depression, represent a growing global challenge. Depression is difficult to diagnose and treat. These difficulties stem from an insufficient understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disorder. It is incredibly challenging to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches without a clear understanding of depression pathology. Neurotransmitters are low in concentration and fluctuate rapidly, making them difficult to investigate. Progress in methods to study the brain has uncovered clues to the pathology of depression and antidepressant mechanisms. In this review, we first describe the three medical hypotheses of depression: the monoamine, plasticity, and inflammation theories. We highlight key analytical methods that have been employed in depression studies. Lastly, we show how these investigations have advanced our knowledge of depression mechanisms and treatment strategies. Thus, via this review, we present the status quo of how chemical measurements are guiding our understanding of the chemical underpinnings of depression and pointing the community toward new antidepressant treatment targets.

Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Tryptophan and brain disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Electrochemical Measurements in the Brain Have Shaped Our Understanding of Depression — Parastoo Hashemi, P. Prieto, et al. · Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS