Short- and Long-term Patient Perceptions Relative to HA Filler Volume Retention

Abstract Background The efficacy and longevity of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is well supported by previous studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, the longitudinal relationship between patient perceptions and physical volume retention remains unknown. Objectives To assess the short-term relationship between patient perception and measurable volume loss across facial regions and to evaluate long-term satisfaction and treatment-seeking behavior after filler injection. Methods A prospective study enrolled female patients ages 40–65 who received HA fillers to four facial regions using three different products. FACE-Q surveys and 3D imaging were obtained at baseline, immediately post-injection, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Relative changes in volume and PRO scores were analyzed using univariate methods. A long-term follow-up survey was administered 2–5 years post-treatment. Results A total of 101 patients were included. Discordance between objective volume retention and matched PRO scores was observed in the malar and upper perioral regions, where perceived improvement persisted despite volume loss. The lips showed initial alignment between perception and volume, which diverged over time. The lower perioral region exhibited the most proportional decline in satisfaction to volume loss. FACE-Q psychological function and aging appraisal domains demonstrated greater durability than measured volume. Among 35 long-term respondents, 67% reported increased likelihood to seek additional treatments, while cost was the main barrier among those who did not. Conclusions Patient satisfaction often outlasts objective filler volume in select regions. These results could guide patient–provider discussions on treatment frequency for different facial regions, as perceived benefits may persist beyond measurable correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Published
2026-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag030
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short- and Long-term Patient Perceptions Relative to HA Filler Volume Retention

Robyn B. Broach, Theodore E. Habarth-Morales, Malia Voytik, Ivona Percec et al.
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Short- and Long-term Patient Perceptions Relative to HA Filler Volume Retention

Robyn B. Broach, Theodore E. Habarth-Morales, Malia Voytik, Ivona Percec, H. Clinton Davis, Salman Khan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The efficacy and longevity of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is well supported by previous studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, the longitudinal relationship between patient perceptions and physical volume retention remains unknown. Objectives To assess the short-term relationship between patient perception and measurable volume loss across facial regions and to evaluate long-term satisfaction and treatment-seeking behavior after filler injection. Methods A prospective study enrolled female patients ages 40–65 who received HA fillers to four facial regions using three different products. FACE-Q surveys and 3D imaging were obtained at baseline, immediately post-injection, and at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Relative changes in volume and PRO scores were analyzed using univariate methods. A long-term follow-up survey was administered 2–5 years post-treatment. Results A total of 101 patients were included. Discordance between objective volume retention and matched PRO scores was observed in the malar and upper perioral regions, where perceived improvement persisted despite volume loss. The lips showed initial alignment between perception and volume, which diverged over time. The lower perioral region exhibited the most proportional decline in satisfaction to volume loss. FACE-Q psychological function and aging appraisal domains demonstrated greater durability than measured volume. Among 35 long-term respondents, 67% reported increased likelihood to seek additional treatments, while cost was the main barrier among those who did not. Conclusions Patient satisfaction often outlasts objective filler volume in select regions. These results could guide patient–provider discussions on treatment frequency for different facial regions, as perceived benefits may persist beyond measurable correction.

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.